Milton elaborates on this claim that we should read and prove anything we want, for we are sufficient to judge aright.
弥尔顿详尽阐明了这个论点,我们应该多读书,去求证自己想知道的所有事,因此我们才能够做正确的判断。
But it's a difficult claim because even as Milton makes this claim, he manages to undermine its force.
但这是困难的,因为即便是弥尔顿做出了这一宣告,他也打算降低它所蕴含的威力。
This is by the way--just because one can make this claim and, I think, make it stick in certain cases, doesn't mean that the proposition is any less outrageous.
还要指出的是 就算有人提出了这种理论,有些情况下甚至能说通,并不说明这种说法就能让人接受了。
What I want to do now is focus on the scientific foundation of this claim.
现在我要做的,是专注于这个主张的科学基础。
Well, the most common argument for this claim I think takes the following form.
这个说法通常的论据,我想是以以下方式阐述。
And from the titles we know he considered for this book, none of them make that claim "The Life of Richard Wright."
从他为书起的名字就能知道,没有人提议书名应该是《理查?莱特的一生》
So, one of the things I've tried to claim in describing Genesis 1 is That in this story evil is represented not as a physical reality.
我在描述《创世纪》第一章中试图做的是,在这个故事中,邪恶并不是一种实体的存在。
He spoke about, and I like to claim this approach, the position of scholarship to which we call the Higher Naivete.
他是这么说的,我觉得这种方式很好,这是一种叫做"高级天真"的研究方法
And the claim is that when you choose this, in order to justify your decision, you denigrate the one you didn't choose.
对这个行为的解释是,当你选这一粒时,为了表明你的选择是正确的,你会贬低第一次没选上的那粒。
So I claim that this total quantity being produced is less than the competitive quantity, but more in total than the monopoly quantity.
我说吧,这种情况下的总产出,比完全竞争产量要少,但比垄断产量要大
What is it you have to know about this object that was thrown, I claim, is the initial location of the object and the initial velocity.
关于这个物体,我们需要了解什么,我要强调的,就是这个物体的初位置和初速度
And this is now consistent with my claim that I have sorted a list of size N equals 1.
这与我之前所说的是一致的,我已经将N为1的一个序列排好了序。
Already you could say to ask this question is to state a claim.
问这样的问题,等于是在表述一种。
And lying behind this idea, I think, is the claim, the intuition, that it's a presumption to judge whose pleasures are intrinsically higher or worthier or better.
我认为这一观点暗含了一种主张,认为从本质上判定,谁的快乐,更高级,更有价值,或更好是非常无礼的。
This is an outrageous claim. What does it mean?
这一说法让人吃惊,这是什么意思?
So let's look at a couple of passages from your sheet, from Heidegger's Being and Time, from his analytic of the hermeneutic circle, and see what Heidegger has to say about this claim.
所以我们看几篇文章,摘自海德格尔的存在与时间,从他对于解释学循环的分析,看看海德格尔对这个观点看法是何。
Milton had borrowed this claim for an absolute originality.
弥尔顿为了追求极致的创新而借用了这一说法。
If you, at the end of the semester, haven't agreed with me about this particular claim or that particular claim, so be it.
如果你在这个学期末,还是不对我这个特别的观点持赞同意见,那么顺其自然吧。
And people who study this often claim to be studying neural network modeling to try to build smart machines by modeling them after brains.
神经网络的研究者们,通常会说他们是在研究神经网络模型,试图通过模仿大脑反应,而制造出智能机器
I claim that this picture really tells me everything I could possibly want to know.
我觉得从图像上面,我们就能得到所有想知道的信息了
No one can impose their claim of revealed knowledge on another. Does this make Hobbes an atheist, ? as many would have maintained in his day? No.
没人可以把他们声称启示的知识强加于别人,这说明霍布斯是一个无神论者,就像他那个时代很多人一样。
So we have to ask now, now that my claim is, you can ask me any question you want about this particle and I can answer you.
现在我们要问,我的观点是,你可以问我任何关于,这个质点的问题,我都可以回答你们
And this is an interesting claim and one we'll talk about.
这是个有趣的观点,我们以后再来谈它
应用推荐