• That is pretty straightforward. I do not mind having that fight,".

    VOA: standard.2010.01.22

  • But refining in just the right way is going to turn out to be a surprisingly not straightforward matter, at least that's how it seems to me.

    但是让人惊讶的是,要正确地修改它,并不是那么直接而简单的,至少在我看来不是。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Now, you know with constant volume, H now it's not going to be delta H that's U straightforward to measure, it's going to be dealt u, all right.

    好,现在你们知道在体积恒定的条件下,我们得到的不是Δ,我们直接测量到的是Δ,好,但这基本上也是一样的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • If we take this simple straightforward view and say you're dead when you're not P-functioning anymore, then you were dead,on and off and on and off,last night.

    如果我们就用那直接简单的观点,说你就是死了,不再有人格功能了,昨晚你就不断地死亡和复活中度过。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And finally, and most important-- these others have been pretty straightforward-- but what has not been straightforward is something that you might listen to many, many times and not be aware of, and that is chord changes.

    最后,也是最重要的途径,上述的三种途径都非常直截了当,不过也有些不那么直接的东西,即使你听了成千上百遍,也不一定会注意到的是和弦的变化

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • So it's not, as I say altogether straightforward to see how the answer " "Death is bad for me, because when I'm dead I don't exist" how that answers the problem as opposed to simply focusing our attention on the problem ? How can nonexistence be bad for me?

    所以这并不是,就像我说的,那么简单可以领会到这个答案,“死亡对我来说不好,因为我死了我就不存在了“,如何回答了这个问题,和我们仅仅把关注点放在问题本身相反,不存在怎么可能对我来说有坏处呢?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定