Socrates gives a rather lame response.
苏格拉底给了一个非常没有说服力的回答。
Unlike Confucius, Socrates was not asked by rulers how to govern effectively.
与孔子不同，苏格拉底没有被统治者问及该如何有效治理国家。
Aristotle and Socrates debated the nature of "akrasia"—our tendency to do things against our interests.
亚里士多德和苏格拉底讨论了“无自制力”的本质——我们倾向于做违背自己利益的事情。
About 50% of them raised their hands 3 months later, Socrates asked again, "Who still insist on that most simple action of swinging?"
大约有50%的人三个月后举手，苏格拉底再次问道：“谁还坚持最简单的摆动动作？”
Three months later, Socrates asked again.
三个月后，苏格拉底再次问起。
As Socrates said: "You should eat to live; not live to eat."
正如苏格拉底所说：“你吃饭是为了活着；活着不是为了吃饭。”
Ten days later, Socrates asked, "Who still sticks to swinging his arm?"
十天后，苏格拉底问：“谁还在坚持摆动手臂？”
Although that's the sketch of where Socrates wants to go, it doesn't quite give us what we want.
虽然这是苏格拉底想要达到的目的，但它没有提供太多我们想要的。
"Of course! You think this is a simple thing, but it isn't easy in fact." Socrates replied seriously.
“当然！你以为这是件简单的事，其实它并不容易。”苏格拉底认真回答道。
On the first day of school, Socrates told his students, "Today, we'll only learn one thing. That is to swing your arm forward and backward."
在开学的第一天，苏格拉底告诉他的学生：“今天，我们只学一件事情。那就是前后摆动你的手臂。”
让我们再次想起苏格拉底。
他们挑战苏格拉底。
苏格拉底是女性主义吗？
Why is this so important for Socrates?
为何这对苏格拉底这般重要？
I think that goes well back to Socrates.
我想这可以追溯到苏格拉底的年代。
Socrates was the great teacher of Plato.
苏格拉底是柏拉图的老师。
So that's what Socrates should have done.
所以这些是苏格拉底需要做的。
Socrates continues to be sort of the hero.
而苏格拉底仍继续保持着主角的身份。
But is that to do justice to Socrates?
但这就能证明苏格拉底是公正的吗？
他问苏格拉底。
他问苏格拉底。
应用推荐