So we try to remember to say "Wimsatt and Beardsley" even though it is Wimsatt who taught at Yale.

所以我们总说“文萨特和比尔兹利“,尽管在耶鲁教书的只有文萨特。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Again it's Wimsatt and Beardsley, but I already explained how that is.

再次来看文萨特和比尔利兹的观点，尽管我已经说过了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

The rest of contemporary history, including all of the stormy events leading up to Milton's own beloved Puritan Revolution, in which Milton himself, of course, had participated -all of that has been at least at the literal level, at the explicit level, expunged from the poem.

接下来的当代历史，包括所有引领着弥尔顿所钟爱的清教徒革命的,暴风性事件，在那场革命中，弥尔顿本人也参与其中,-所有那些至少在文义层面，在独立于本诗之外可说清的层面，都是很重要的。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

This much, by the way, Wimsatt has in common with Gadamer, because Gadamer doesn't talk much about authors either, and Gadamer is interested in what he calls meaning, the subject matter, die Sache. Right? He's not interested in your sort of expression of that meaning or my expression of that meaning.

顺便说一句，文萨特和葛达玛很大相同之处就在于，葛达玛也不太强调作者的作用，而是对文章的含义，主题感兴趣，不是吗？，他不关注作品在用,你的还是我的表达方式来表现内涵。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选