The passage is also famous because in it Milton does something that he almost never does. Milton has made a mistake.
这篇文章有名也是因为弥尔顿做了一些,他几乎从未做过的事,弥尔顿犯了一个错误。
You also read an article by Milgrom where Milgrom talks about Priestly cultic imagery serving as a kind of theodicy.
在米尔格罗姆的一篇文章中,这篇文章讲到祭司的宗教仪式,被形象化为一种神义论。
The two passages that I'm about to read juxtapose the viewpoints that I've been trying to evoke in describing Gadamer's position.
我要读的这两篇文章在某些观点上是并行的,我在讲伽达默尔的看法时想激发的就是这些观点。
Now I want to contrast that with what we see from Nabokov in this essay, Good Readers and Good Writers.
现在我要把这和《好读者和好作者》这篇文章中,纳博科夫的观点做下比较。
One recent, also, last year, an article from the Globe, also part some statistics, they show the reading guest.
同样,一篇最近刊登在《环球时报》上的文章,报道了一些数据,也表明了一些现实。
He's a better teacher than Scotus or Aquinas, and the text seems almost to suggest that Milton can't do without his own teacher, Edmund Spenser.
他是一位比苏格拉底和阿奎那更好的良师,这些文章几乎暗示了弥尔顿,没有老师埃蒙德·斯潘塞则不能做到弃绝那些诱惑。
I don't actually know whether it's deserved or not, because Yale does not publish information about what the grading averages are.
我不知道这名声是不是我应得的,因为耶鲁并没有对什么是普通的评分标准,发表文章。
Now the added sugar before, does anybody remember from the Eaton article how ancient humans added sugar to things?
在糖类出现以前,有谁还记得伊顿的一篇文章是谈论,祖先是如何在食品中添加糖类
So, I went to the library and I looked up Advances in Molten Salt Chemistry volume six because there's an article in there about the chemistry and electrochemistry of magnesium production.
所以我去了趟图书馆,查阅了,第六版的《高级熔融态盐化学》,因为那里面有一篇关于生产镁的,化学和电化学的文章。
So, there's been a number of articles that documented that stock prices tend to jump shortly after options are issued to managers.
有一些文章记载表明,在公司发给经理们股票期权之后,股票的价格往往会出现短期激涨
I read an article a while back about a private fire company, the Salem Fire Corporation, in Arkansas.
我看过一篇关于私人消防公司的文章,在阿肯色州有一家塞伦消防公司。
It's a huge book which is all about this short story by Balzac, "Sarrasine," that he begins this essay by quoting.
这本大部头的书都是在讲巴尔扎克的短篇小说《沙拉辛》的,在文章开头他引用道。
This is the result, this is the fruit, of the hermeneutic engagement between horizons that results in meaning.
这是阐释学的结果,它的产物,不同视域会合的阐释学能得到文章的含义。
Now the part of the essay just prior to this explains that he gave this little quiz that you see to some college students when he was giving a lecture.
在先前已经解释了这篇文章的一部分,他把你们所看到这个小测试在他的讲座上,给一些大学生做了。
But it's just this making haste toward publication writing something really great right now --that Milton's resisting here.
但就是这种想要发表什么的愿望,种想要创作出好文章的愿望,使得弥尔顿在这里坚持。
That distinction is found in an article in your Jewish Study Bible, an article by Steven Geller .
你们有一本书叫《犹太读经》,其中一篇由史蒂芬·盖勒写的文章中就提到了这个区别。
They read. And one of the people that was reading this literature was a high school teacher who was teaching mathematics in Basil, Switzerland.
其中一个读过这篇文章的人,是个教高中生的老师,在瑞士的罗勒教数学。
Modigliani and Miller wrote a famous article arguing that-- what I just said--I just tried to say it in very intuitive terms.
莫迪利阿尼和米勒有一篇非常著名的文章是讲...,刚提过的,我想用直观的词汇来描述
Now this may suggest a certain condescension both toward theory and toward literary text, which is not at all intended.
选择这篇文章也许意味着,要对理论和文本进行一定的浓缩,这一点不是我想要的。
It does so by insisting on a complex mode of ambiguity that governs the passage--not atmosphere.
这篇文章很朦胧,很复杂,算不上是一种气氛。
To give a text an Author is to impose a limit on that text, to furnish it with a final signified, to close the writing.
在创作的时候,作者会给文章加上个限制,他最后会给出一个象征意义来结束写作。
But the roles are reversed in the following passage, and this is where the text blows hot and cold.
但是在接下来的文章中角色互调了,这是文中描述冷热无常的情景。
Does he want to say that he's just an author function, that his textual field is a kind of set of structural operations within which one can discover an author?
他是不是想说他只是个功能性的作者,而他所写的文章只是一套,用于发现作者的结构上的应用程序?
In the book in which the essay "The Intentional Fallacy" appeared, a book called The Verbal Icon, Wimsatt collaborated with Monroe Beardsley on three essays, and this is one of them.
意图谬误“是文萨特与比尔兹利一起,为一本叫做《语言象征》的书,写的三篇文章中的一篇。
It's very helpful for me, as I address you, to think about what you're seeing in the text, and that helps me to think about what I want to say to you.
这对我很有用,正如我和你们说的,想一想你们在文章里看到了什么,那会帮助我思考要和你们说什么。
Let me just read two texts to that effect, first going back to Roland Barthes on page 877.
让我们读两篇和这个意思大致相同的文章,首先翻回877页罗兰,巴特的文章。
So I'm going to read passages, and I hope you'll jump around with me if you have the text in your hand.
拿到文章的同学,尽量和我一起看,以后上课。
What it means is that in understanding a text, we are attempting to grasp it in paraphrase.
它是说,在理解文章时,我们在试着给它释义,并掌握它。
Our primary text will be the excerpt in your book from Hans-Georg Gadamer and a few passages that I'll be handing out from Martin Heidegger and E.D. Hirsch.
主要内容就在大家手上课本里,汉斯·格奥尔格·加达默尔的节选以及,我将带给大家的马丁·海德格尔和赫希的一些文章。
应用推荐