您要找的是不是:

  • Now, we know from the work in the Bystander effect that in general which one are we more likely to help in, when we're the only person or multiple?

    我们从旁观者效应的实验中知道,我们在哪种情景上更可能出手相救,一个人,还是有其他人时?

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • And in fact, when it's the only person just about everybody helps regardless of the color of the person in trouble but when you're with other people there's a big difference.

    事实上,在一个人的情景里,任何人都会出手相救,不管陷入困境的人是什么肤色的,但当你旁边有其他人时,那差别就大了。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • the economy begins to recover, and then Hoover and the Congress decided what to do to fix things and they immediately make things worse, and Franklin Roosevelt comes in and keeps fixing it and keeps fixing it and keeps fixing it and the thing is bad bad bad.

    经济开始复苏,然而胡佛和国会,却决定开始干预,并且他们一出手就把事情弄得很糟,然后富兰克林上任,不断再修理,不断修理不断修理,情况还是很糟糕很糟糕。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • They're looking at me. I'm not doing anything.

    他们看着我,我也不出手相救。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • So before, because of all these anti-business rhetoric, once you start intervene, s not just the question of the merit of the particular intervention, s the fact that nobody knows ll be intervening again.

    所以之前,因为反商业言论,一旦你开始干预,问题就不仅仅在于,it’,某一桩干预事件的好处,而是没人能预料,it’,政府何时又会出手,when,you’

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定