-
And all this is, is saying that when you take a mixed second derivative, it doesn't matter in which order you take the two derivatives.
麦克斯韦关系的本质是,当你考虑混合的二阶导数时，求导的顺序不影响最后的结果,现在，我们利用这些关系。
-
I think that having a forced voter turnout would only force an uninformed vote.
我认为，强制选民投票的结果是不知情的投票。
-
Let's test it in all possible combinations of x and y and see if we get the right answer.
来测试并看看,返回的结果正确不正确。
-
How many bonding electrons does c l have? All right. Let's see, we've got a mixed response here, it turns out it has two bonding electrons.
氯有多少成键电子？好，让我们来看看，大家的回答不太一致，结果应该是两个成键电子。
-
And then people choose subconsciously, not consciously to ignore the research and go with her heart.
然后人们下意识地选择，不自觉地忽视研究所得的坏结果。
-
The best thing for you is to have the other guy tidy up and the worst thing for you is to tidy up for the other guy.
让别人去打扫卫生是你最希望的结果,你为大家打扫卫生是你最不希望的结果
-
One result of this asymmetrical division is a committed progenitor cell.
这种不对称分裂的一个结果,是产生定向的祖细胞
-
He says, "to succeed in many things or many times is 'difficult.' For instance, to repeat the same throw of dice 10,000 times would be impossible; whereas, to make it once or twice is comparatively easy."
他说,要成就很多事情,或成就一件事情很多次,是很困难的,比如,掷一万次骰子都得到同样的结果,是不可能的,但是,掷一两次却是相对容易的
-
As long as you're dealing with state functions it doesn't matter to get at the same results here.
不影响结果,我们的推导就基于这一点。
-
This is the plus or minus, so the product of the uncertainty and the momentum.
是加或减，所以不确定度和动量的结果。
-
They are mere personifications of abstract ideas, and it's not at all clear that Sin and her son, Death, exist as individual entities in the same way, or on the same plane, that Satan does, for example, or Beelzebub.
他们仅仅是将抽象的思想拟人化的结果，但我们不清楚的是罪恶之神和她的儿子死神，以同样的方式或在同一个星球作为独立的个体存在，例如撒旦或者苍蝇王比尔泽布也是这样。
-
Everyone knows from calculus that if you're trying to find a function about which you know only the derivative, you can always add a constant to one person's answer without changing anything.
学过微积分的人都知道,如果你想根据已知的导数,求出其原函数,你总是可以给某人的答案,随便加一个常数,且不影响结果
-
The trouble is, you just don't know when that explosion took place, and since there are several periods in this general area that we're talking about now, in which something big happened, some great change takes place, it turns out different people want to have their explosion at different times.
问题是,你不了解火山爆发的,确切时间以及这种爆发,在这个区域又延续了很多个时期,这些时期发生了许多重大事件和重大变化,结果就是不同人对,火山爆发的时间推测各不相同
-
But I don't really know 'cause he didn't have the Internet. See?
但我不知道具体的结果，因为他不能使用网络。明白了吗？
-
Again, there's no advertising affecting this, there's no parents being irresponsible and buying sugary cereals for the poor little animals.
此外,这个结果并不受广告营销的影响,也不因为有父母不负责任,给这个可怜的小动物买高糖的谷物
-
The end result of which is that the computer forgets where all of your files and folders are.
最终的结果是电脑不知道文件,或者文件夹在哪里存着。
-
It is a much scarrier idea than saying I have this, I'm going to do it, I'm going to put it down there as opposed to being open to what may come and being uncertain whether that would be something good enough.
这和，我知道了，我要做这个，我想写这个，这种确定感相比,对可能的结果保持一种开放的心态，不知道,期待能否满足的未知感相比，更挑战一些。
-
Against that, I suppose, you've got pessimists-- pessimists who say, " "No, no. Although life perhaps has some good things, " the overall grand balance " is negative for everybody in every circumstance.
与之相反还有悲观主义者-,悲观主义者会说，“不，也许生活有些美好的事情，“但总体的结果,“在任何情况下对任何人都是负数。
-
And since we're not going to grade it, it seems kind of unfair to ask you to hand it in.
上交这个的结果，看起来有点不公平。
-
If you want a more technical term for that , and you'll remember this from economics 115 can lead to outcomes that are "Inefficient," that are "Pareto inefficient," But "Suck" Will do for today.
要是想说的更专业店,记不记得在经济学115里面说的,会导致“不充分的”结果,即"帕雷托效率",但我们今天说"糟糕"就可以了
-
if you don't want to use that, you can also derive it as we did every time, it should intuitively make sense how we got there. But the exams are pretty short, so we don't want you doing that every time, so we'll save the 2 minutes and give you the equations directly, but it's still important to know how to use them.
吸收的和发射的，如果你不想用公式,你也可以每次都向我们这样推导它,很直观的就能得到结果，但考试时间很短，我们不希望你们每次都推导,所以我们会直告诉你，让你节省2分钟，但知道如何应用它十分重要。
-
All right. We've got a big majority, and both are logical ways of thinking, but it turns out that the majority is correct, which is not always the case, but the electron is not ejected in this case.
好，大多数人都这么认为，这两种看法都是合乎逻辑的，但结果是大多数人是对的，这种情况不经常发生，但是电子在这种情况下,确实不会被逐出。
-
I think it depends on whether the list is odd or even in length. Actually, that's probably not true. With one, it'll probably always get it down there, but if I've made it just equal to two I might have lost.
是奇数还是偶数，事实上,这是不正确的，如果最后剩下一个,那可能得到了结果,如果剩下两个，可能错了,所以，首先我们要格外。
-
The outcome we believe I think, is that imperfect competition should look something between monopoly and perfect competition, it shouldn't look like perfect competition.
这个可信的结果是,不完全竞争应该是介于,垄断和完全竞争之间,而不是与完全竞争相似
-
The underlying estimates may not accord with your belief or your intuitive sense of common sense.
各项资产有关估算结果可能与你的预想,或直觉不相符合
-
So they'd much rather just stay the way they are and not have another electron come on, and it turns out that halogens have the highest electron affinities.
所以它们更愿意保持在原来的状态,不愿意再增加一个电子,结果卤族元素具有最高的电子亲和能。
-
So you can see that we're starting to have a very complicated equation, and it turns out that it's mathematically impossible to even solve the exact Schrodinger equation as we move up to higher numbers of electrons.
所有你们可以看到我们得到了,一个非常复杂的方程，结果是它在数学上是,不可能解出确定的,薛定谔方程,当我们考虑更高的电子数目的时候。
-
Second thing we've got to worry about is, what's a basic step? All right, if I bury a whole lot of computation inside of something, I can say, wow, this program, you know, runs in one step. Unfortunately, that one step calls the Oracle at Delphi and gets an answer back. Maybe not quite what you want.
我们需要担心的第二件事情就是，什么该作为一个基本的步骤呢？,如果我把一大堆的计算过程放到里面，我可以说，噢，这个程序你知道的，一步就完成了，不幸的是,这一步可能要靠预言家才能得到答案,这可能跟你想要的结果不太相同吧。
-
And this is a little different from what happened ten or so years ago, but the so-called Y2K problem was essentially the result of programmers not really having the foresight to realize, "Maybe we shouldn't use so few bits or so few digits to represent a year because eventually this will be a problem."
这个跟10年前发生的事情有点不一样,那个所谓的“Y2K“问题,本质上的结果是,程序员没有真实地预见和认识到，“可能我们没必要用到这些位数或数字,来表示一年，但是最终这个将会,是个问题“
-
And I don't quite remember from reading or from class how big these things are, well, it turns out -- and this is sometimes useful, later on more likely than now -- but C has a size of operator that takes an argument in parenthesis and it will tell you how much space is used to store that particular data type.
我不太记得类中的这些类型,是多大的，嗯，结果是--这个在以后比现在，可能是更有用的--不过C语言中有个sizeof的操作符,其中括号里有一个参数,它会告诉我们，要存储一个类型的数据,需要占用多大空间。
应用推荐