• It's a kind of imprisonment, understanding, and when Heidegger says, wouldn't it be great not to have to merely understand?

    理解是一种禁锢,海德格尔说,不必去理解不是很好

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • On the contrary, God explicitly commands humans to be fruitful and multiply, and he does that in the P-source, right?

    相反地,上帝曾明确要求人类,开枝散叶人丁兴旺,而这属于不洁的范畴,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?

    对吧,那将会是一个完全不同的情况,难道不是吗,因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的,对吧?

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Truth always creeps through all of our language it doesn't always but sometimes creeps through our language, doesn't it?

    真相往往隐藏在我们所说的每一句话里,不是经常也是偶尔,隐藏在我们的话语中,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 美国内战与重建课程节选

  • If the average age of death was something like forty-five, maybe a fifty-fifty chance of--high risk-- of one of the parents dying.

    那么这个概率其实很低,不是吗,大概有高达50%的可能性,双亲中的一人会死去

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • You were leaning his, the beauties of the man to me the other day ? I thought... No?

    前几天,你还跟我绘声绘色地说他有多好呢,我原以为。。。,难道不是吗

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • You know we all say, "Ah, nature, isn't nature nice? Isn't it pretty?"

    我们常说:,“啊!自然!自然不是很美妙?自然不是很美好?“

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • We tend to think of the separation of powers doctrine as necessary for the security and liberty of the individual ? don't we?

    我们倾向于,将分权原理想成是,个人安全与自由的必备条件,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • Of course, there are various other things we could appeal to in terms of supernatural occurrences, right?

    当然,还有很多其他的东西,我们可以诉诸,超自然事件,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And this reaction here is the inverse of ionization, isn't it?

    这是离子化的另一种形式,不是吗

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • It has no observable nationality at all, does it?

    那么这本,并没有显示出任何的异国色彩,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 现代诗歌课程节选

  • From equation of state data. Terrific, right?

    非常好,不是吗

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • Think about that for a moment. That's a problem, isn't it?

    仔细想想,这是一个难题,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

  • All right. That was dramatic, wasn't it?

    好的,很戏剧性,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • That was a quality item there, wasn't it?

    那可是个质量不错的玩意,不是吗

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • Sounds better up there, doesn't it?

    在这边听起来更棒,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • Now, this question is fun to have fun with in some ways because it's fraught with stereotypes, isn't it?

    探讨南方的特点很有意思,因为这其中充满了我们的成见,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 美国内战与重建课程节选

  • If you stop and think of it as a grammatical question, you say to yourself, "Gee, that's a very good question, isn't it, because, of course, the easiest thing in the world is to tell the dancer from the dance.

    如果你停下来,把它当成一个语法型问句,你对自己说,“哈,那是个很好的问题,不是吗“,因为,当然,世界上最简单的事,就是将舞者和舞蹈分开。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Kind of pleasant, I guess, right? " The desire to return to the quiescence of the organic world."

    听起来还不错,不是吗?,“希望回到静态的无机世界的愿望“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • It would be kind of exhilarating, wouldn't it, to be able just to have something before us.

    这令人兴奋,不是吗,可以只看在我们眼前的东西而不加解读。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • This can't be a job the body does, because the body's only got its bodily capacities, right?

    这是身体做不到的,因为身体仅有其肉体性的功能,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But we all know do we not that most contemporary political scientists tend to be liberals. Their values are liberal values.

    但我们都知道,不是吗?最当代的,政治科学家倾向于是自由主义者,其价值观是自由主义的价值观。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • We all want to be neat and busy, don't we?

    我们都想要变得简洁而忙碌,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Contrast this book, Prufrock and Other Observations, the subtitle left off here of the cover of T.S. Eliot's great book, published in 1917. This is a different object, isn't it?

    把这本《普鲁弗洛克的情诗》和其他的《观察》相比,注意艾略特这本史诗般的书上方的这个副标题,这是在1917年出版的,这是一个截然不同的主题,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 现代诗歌课程节选

  • Well, I realize that for you guys it's too late, right?

    我知道对你们来说这太晚了,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Well, they don't have to share equally, do they?

    他们不需要完全相等的共享,不是吗

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • Here is Hobbes' rewriting of the Golden Rule in terms of these laws of nature but these raise a question for us ? as readers of Hobbes. Right? Don't they?

    这里霍布斯从自然法的角度,重写的黄金法则,但是这给我们这些霍布斯的的读者们,带来了一个问题,对吧!不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • But the idea that regimes may be created or founded by a set of deliberate acts raises a further question that we will study ? and is inseparable from the study of regimes.

    但政体可能是经一系列深思熟虑的举动创设,与建立的概念,导出了另一个,我们将加以研究的问题,这个问题与政体研究密不可分,不是吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • You were certain of that, right?

    你们很确定这一点,不是吗

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • Prideful people, he tells us, are those overflowing with confidence about their own abilities to succeed and ? we all know people like this, don't we, like Yale students? They're all verflowing with confidence, kind of alpha types.

    他说,有傲骄感的人是那些,充溢着对他们获得,成功之能力的自信,我们都熟悉这种人,不是吗,就像耶鲁的学生一样,他们都自信满满,什么都想争第一。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定