What can I conclude, now I've concluded that the strategies 68 through 100 essentially don't exist or have been deleted.
目前为止我们能得到什么结论,68到100的选项不存在了,或者说已经被剔除了
One tip about this, try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players before you delete, then delete.
这里有一个窍门,在剔除之前试着找出,所有参与人的劣势策略,然后再剔除它们
One example of a way people have used this, is that they've taken the gene that ordinarily produces a milk protein.
利用这种方式的一个例子就是,他们把原本产羊奶蛋白的基因剔除
There's still plenty of it the food supply, believe me, but some companies have taken them out.
相信我,其实还有很多厂商仍在使用,但有些公司已经将反式脂肪剔除了
How do we get the religious actors off the stage? -Right.
如何才能剔除宗教因素?,-是的。
Well, now we're talking some real after inflation returns that can be consumed.
现在看看剔除通货膨胀后,可供消费的真实回报率
But there're a few details to take away.
我们先剔除这些细节。
But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.
但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略
Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.
一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3
I threw away all strategies that were never a best response, then I looked at the strategies that were left.
我剔除了非最佳对策的策略,然后我看看还剩下哪些策略
We can delete those strategies and once we delete those strategies, all that's left are choices 1 through 67.
我们可以剔除那些策略,一旦如此,剩下只有1到67的数
If I'm going to make insulin from this I have to know that I've got the introns spliced out correctly.
如果我要用这些来生成胰岛素,我就得知道是不是把内含子都准确剔除了
We said players should never play a strategy that's never a best response to anything, so we threw those away.
我们学到了参与人不应该选择,非最佳对策的策略,应该剔除它们
We could do that; we could try iteratively deleting dominated strategies and see if that process converged.
可以尝试迭代剔除劣势策略,然后看看会不会趋向于某种结果
But we're seeing that these are choices, that perhaps, are ruled out by this kind of reasoning.
然而我们发现这些策略,会因为某种推理而被剔除
So if we do the procedure of iteratively deleting dominated strategies, going back again, looking what's dominated, all that's left is 5 and 6.
如果我们按照这个程序,迭代剔除劣势,不断回头看看那些策略是劣势的,最终将只剩下立场5和6
But they are dominated once we deleted not just the dominated strategies, but also the strategies that were dominated once we deleted the dominated strategies.
但是当我们我们,剔除原博弈中的劣势策略以及,第一次剔除之后仍处于劣势的策略后,它们就又继续成为了劣势策略
And when I threw those away, I was left once again with a little box, and I could do it again, and again, and again.
剔除之后,我得到了更小的方格,我可以一次一次的重复这个过程
So when we looked at domination and deleted dominated strategies, we got nowhere here.
因此当我们寻找并剔除劣势策略时,我们是无从下手的
So have I convinced you that there's something you can do with iterative deletion?
大家都理解,有关迭代剔除的内容了吧
I said those strategies that were a best response to things that have now been thrown away, but not best response otherwise, I can throw those away too.
这些策略是已被我们的剔除策略的,最佳对策,但仍不是最佳对策,我就剔除它们
So all of the strategies 45 through 67, are gone now.
至此所有45到67的数也被剔除了
We also saw in that numbers game last time that in some games, but by no means all games, in some games this process actually converges to a single choice.
我们同样可以发现,在某些博弈中,不是所有的博弈,迭代剔除劣势策略,最终会导致唯一的选择
The strategies I'm about to throw away now, they're not--it isn't that they're not best responses, they are best responses to something.
我要剔除的策略,并非都不是最佳对策,它们可能是某种情况下的最佳对策
Delete those. Delete those for everyone else, because everyone else is not going to play a dominated strategy.
应该剔除它们,其他人也会这么做,因为其他人也不会,采用劣势策略
We used iterative deletion in a relatively abstract setting, or not abstract, rather a play setting last time in which were choosing numbers.
我们在相对抽象的背景下探讨迭代剔除,其实也没那么抽象,比如上一讲,我们做的选数字的游戏
So if the only tool I taught you in this class was dominated strategies and the iterative deletion of dominated strategies we'd be stuck.
所以之前讲的,不要采用劣势策略,和迭代剔除劣势策略在这里就不奏效了
If we delete the strategies 1 and 10, which were dominated, then does 3 dominate 2?
如果我们剔除劣势策略1和10,那么策略3优于策略2吗
Great animation but not perhaps a good date movie, so it's gone. Everyone see that?
虽然这部动画很好但显然不适合约会看,把它剔除了,大家都看明白了吧
应用推荐