• What can I conclude, now I've concluded that the strategies 68 through 100 essentially don't exist or have been deleted.

    目前为止我们能得到什么结论,68到100的选项不存在了,或者说已经被剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • One tip about this, try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players before you delete, then delete.

    这里有一个窍门,在剔除之前试着找出,所有参与人的劣势策略,然后再剔除它们

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • One example of a way people have used this, is that they've taken the gene that ordinarily produces a milk protein.

    利用这种方式的一个例子就是,他们把原本产羊奶蛋白的基因剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

  • There's still plenty of it the food supply, believe me, but some companies have taken them out.

    相信我,其实还有很多厂商仍在使用,但有些公司已经将反式脂肪剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

  • How do we get the religious actors off the stage? -Right.

    如何才能剔除宗教因素?,-是的。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • Well, now we're talking some real after inflation returns that can be consumed.

    现在看看剔除通货膨胀后,可供消费的真实回报率

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • But there're a few details to take away.

    我们先剔除这些细节。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.

    但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.

    一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I threw away all strategies that were never a best response, then I looked at the strategies that were left.

    剔除了非最佳对策的策略,然后我看看还剩下哪些策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We can delete those strategies and once we delete those strategies, all that's left are choices 1 through 67.

    我们可以剔除那些策略,一旦如此,剩下只有1到67的数

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If I'm going to make insulin from this I have to know that I've got the introns spliced out correctly.

    如果我要用这些来生成胰岛素,我就得知道是不是把内含子都准确剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

  • We said players should never play a strategy that's never a best response to anything, so we threw those away.

    我们学到了参与人不应该选择,非最佳对策的策略,应该剔除它们

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We could do that; we could try iteratively deleting dominated strategies and see if that process converged.

    可以尝试迭代剔除劣势策略,然后看看会不会趋向于某种结果

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But we're seeing that these are choices, that perhaps, are ruled out by this kind of reasoning.

    然而我们发现这些策略,会因为某种推理而被剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if we do the procedure of iteratively deleting dominated strategies, going back again, looking what's dominated, all that's left is 5 and 6.

    如果我们按照这个程序,迭代剔除劣势,不断回头看看那些策略是劣势的,最终将只剩下立场5和6

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • But they are dominated once we deleted not just the dominated strategies, but also the strategies that were dominated once we deleted the dominated strategies.

    但是当我们我们,剔除原博弈中的劣势策略以及,第一次剔除之后仍处于劣势的策略后,它们就又继续成为了劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And when I threw those away, I was left once again with a little box, and I could do it again, and again, and again.

    剔除之后,我得到了更小的方格,我可以一次一次的重复这个过程

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So when we looked at domination and deleted dominated strategies, we got nowhere here.

    因此当我们寻找并剔除劣势策略时,我们是无从下手的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So have I convinced you that there's something you can do with iterative deletion?

    大家都理解,有关迭代剔除的内容了吧

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I said those strategies that were a best response to things that have now been thrown away, but not best response otherwise, I can throw those away too.

    这些策略是已被我们的剔除策略的,最佳对策,但仍不是最佳对策,我就剔除它们

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So all of the strategies 45 through 67, are gone now.

    至此所有45到67的数也被剔除

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We also saw in that numbers game last time that in some games, but by no means all games, in some games this process actually converges to a single choice.

    我们同样可以发现,在某些博弈中,不是所有的博弈,迭代剔除劣势策略,最终会导致唯一的选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The strategies I'm about to throw away now, they're not--it isn't that they're not best responses, they are best responses to something.

    我要剔除的策略,并非都不是最佳对策,它们可能是某种情况下的最佳对策

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Delete those. Delete those for everyone else, because everyone else is not going to play a dominated strategy.

    应该剔除它们,其他人也会这么做,因为其他人也不会,采用劣势策略

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • We used iterative deletion in a relatively abstract setting, or not abstract, rather a play setting last time in which were choosing numbers.

    我们在相对抽象的背景下探讨迭代剔除,其实也没那么抽象,比如上一讲,我们做的选数字的游戏

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if the only tool I taught you in this class was dominated strategies and the iterative deletion of dominated strategies we'd be stuck.

    所以之前讲的,不要采用劣势策略,和迭代剔除劣势策略在这里就不奏效了

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If we delete the strategies 1 and 10, which were dominated, then does 3 dominate 2?

    如果我们剔除劣势策略1和10,那么策略3优于策略2吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Great animation but not perhaps a good date movie, so it's gone. Everyone see that?

    虽然这部动画很好但显然不适合约会看,把它剔除了,大家都看明白了吧

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定