They're plainly interrelated in a variety of ways, but it's more to the question of determinism I want to return today.

在很多方面他们都相互联系，但是今天我要多谈点有关决定论的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Archie, of course, can't stand this because for him it's perfectly clear that a rhetorical question is a rhetorical question.

阿齐当然无法忍受，因为对他来说,很明显修辞问句就是修辞问句。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

That's not the question. The question is, does life on the experience machine ? give you everything worth having in life?

那不是我的问题，我的问题是，体验机器上的人生,能给你生命中值得拥有的一切吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Our course over the term will come back to this question over and over again, and it will also come back to the generic question of autobiography.

我们这学期的课程,会反复回顾这个问题,也会再回到关于自传的一般性问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

It's a good question. The question is, "What are the chances that somebody with autism will be able to overcome their deficiencies?"

不错的问题,这个问题是,"孤独症患者,能够克服自身缺陷的几率会有多大"

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

When we ask this question-- this very important question, suddenly we see possibilities that we didn't see before.

当我们提出这个极为重要的问题，就会看到之前没看到的潜能。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

A famous mathematician once said "Every question must have a correct answer " for every question one answer."

一位著名的数学家曾说过,“每一个问题都必定有一个正确的答案,每一个人们所回答的问题“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

PROFESSOR: Great question. So the question is, how do you choose an algorithm, why would I choose to use a pseudo-polynomial algorithm when I don't know how big the solution is likely to be, I think that's one way to think about it.

教授：问得好，所以问题是，你怎样选择算法，为什么当我,不知道解决方案会有多大的时候,我要选伪多项式算法呢，我想这是一种思考问题的方式。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

This question mark I mean it's obviously not a question mark.

这一个问号，显然不是一个真正的问号。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Oh, no question, no question.

哦，当然是这样。

斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

This question of determinism is as important in the discourse of literary theory as the question of skepticism.

在文学理论的话语中,决定论的问题和怀疑论的问题是同等重要的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Edith, a reader of sublime simplicity, as de Man says, misinterprets the rhetorical question as a grammatical question: "What is the difference? I'm curious to know."

而依迪斯一个极端天真的读者，正如德曼所说，错误地将这个修辞问句理解成一个语法型问句：,“区别在哪里呢，我想知道“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Now in thinking about this question thinking about this question it's important not to misunderstand what we were asking.

思考这个问题的时候,在思考这个问题,重要的是不要误解,我们问的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So let me turn to a different approach to solving the question, answering the question,which one should we believe?

所以让我用另一个方法来解决这个问题，回答该相信哪一个理论的问题？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So the question was-- First, it was the accusation before the question, that I'm holding a sort of double standard.

其问题是,首先,在这个问题之前他指责,我在施行双重标准

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That is to say, we're going to focus on the question of what a poem is, and the question "What criteria should we invoke in order to read it for the best and correctly?"

换句话说，我们将把注意力集中在,“什么是诗歌“,和“为了读懂诗歌,我们需要具备哪些素质“的问题上“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选