As I've been saying a number of times that's the best version of the body view, although not all body theorists believe that.
我已经说过很多次了,那是肉体论最好的版本,尽管并非所有肉体论专家都这么看。
And so although I'll be saying a great deal about the Phaedo once we turn to it, I want to just take a minute or two and say a couple of introductory remarks.
尽管在讲到斐多篇时,我会向你们详尽介绍其中的内容,但现在,我还是想先花一两分钟的时间,做一个简短的引言
Note that he is not saying, although he is sometimes taken to be saying this, that he is not saying biologically implanted desire or impulse that we have or share that leads us to engage in political life.
注意,他并未亲口说,但他有时会被认为说过这话,但他并未说过,生物性根植的欲望或冲动,引导我们,致力于政治生活。
Well,easy to imagine the fan of this view coming back yet again and saying, Although it's true that our hero takes the place of the other man on the guillotine, what ends up happening,of course,is that our hero dies his own death.
很容易想象这种观点的支持者会反驳说,虽然的确我们的主角是代替了别人上断头台,但结果还是他独自经历死亡。
So although the personality with no branching rule avoids the problem of what to say about duplicates, by saying when there's branching,neither of them is Shelly Kagan, the branching rule itself seems very counter-intuitive.
所以纵然带有无分支规定的人格理论,避开了关于复制的问题,说当出现分支时,Shelly,Kagan就不复存在了,这个无分支规定本身就很反直觉。
应用推荐