I was hoping for a simpler answer, which is, just run it. Which is, yeah I know, seems like a dumb thing to say, right?

我希望一个简单点儿的答案，比如说去运行它吧，这方法看起来挺笨的对不对？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Now this is-- again, testament to the fact that computers, you know, sophisticated or scary as they might seem to some, they're pretty stupid devices.

我再说一遍，事实上，电脑，你知道的，在某些人看来，很尖端，很高科技，其实它很笨的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Instead of taking that one vase, the thief could take two radios. And get more value. So the greedy thief, in some sense, gets the wrong answer. But maybe isn't so dumb.

这个贼可以带走两个收音机，这样总价值更大，因此这个贪婪的贼,在某种意义上没有得到正确的答案,但是可能它也不笨。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So if Pepsi is dumb enough to price above monopoly, sure I will undercut Pepsi but I won't undercut Pepsi by a penny, I'll undercut Pepsi all the way down to the monopoly price and make monopoly profits.

如果百事笨到把价格设的高于垄断价格,我当然要定价比百事低,但不是低一点,我要把价格设得比百事低直至垄断价格,并获取垄断收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The reason being, again, computers are not very bright.

你们也知道的，电脑很笨的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

OK. Having said that, let's look at doing some sorts. And I'm going to start with a couple of dumb sorting mechanisms. Actually, that's the wrong way saying it, they're simply brain-damaged, they're not dumb, OK?

我们来做些排序吧,我要开始处理一些愚蠢的排序机制,事实上，我说的不正确，他们就是没脑子，不是笨,发明出来后，他们就在不停的被挑战？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Kind of a stupid program, why?

是个比较笨的程序，为什么？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

It's kind of a stupid lack of feature that this is the case, but notice that here is main, at the top of my file.

这是有点笨的，缺少特征的，就是这种情况，但是注意这里是main函数，在我的文件的顶端。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Well it's a stupid looking program, but because I had more new line characters, and because I was using percent C, for individual characters, one per line, now I'm seeing dot slash ARG V2, well, now if I go ahead and rerun this with foo, I get this effect as well.

这是一个看起来很笨的程序，但是因为我有更多的新行代码，因为我使用的是%c，为单个字符使用的，每一行一个，现在我看到的是，/argv2，好的，现在如果我继续用foo返回它，我产生了这样的效果。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选