现在不是葛达玛在坚持绝对的连续性。
Now it's not that Gadamer is insisting on absolute continuity.
这就是让它不同于,葛达玛保守的连续性传统标准之处。
That's what makes it so different from Gadamer's conservative continuous traditional Canon.
现在我讲讲我引用的那段话,我用它来与葛达玛那一课,结尾部分的一段进行对比。
But now I want to say something about the passage from which I quoted over against the passage from Gadamer at the end of the Gadamer lecture.
As I say, it's a wonderful irony that this particular difficulty in reading is precisely what Gadamer calls being pulled up short.
如我所说,这是个有趣的讽刺,这个阅读中特别的困难,正是葛达玛说的因某事“突然停住“
We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.
我们可以说,伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。
Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."
赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但他是温姆斯特的学生,温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“
应用推荐