THU-OLSR 算法所做的主要工作之一是类比几种路由协议，使路由开销 （Routing Overhead）最小。所比较的协议包括传统协议、FSR、OLSR 和IO-OLSR。
基于40个网页-相关网页
（4）归一化路由开销（Normalized Routing Load）：网络中 所有节点发送的路由控制分组的数目与节点接收到的数据报
基于12个网页-相关网页
The experimental results show that AOMDV protocol provides better performance than AODV protocol in terms of average delay and route discovery frequency,and worse performance in terms of packet delivery ratio and normalized rooting load.
实验结果表明,AOMDV协议在平均延时和路由发现频率上优于AODV协议,在分组投递率和归一化路由开销方面的性能低于AODV协议。
参考来源 - AODV和AOMDV路由协议性能分析与比较Compared with the traditional algorithm, the results obtained by NS2 show that the routing cost is decreased by 50% and the packet delivery ratio is increased by 5%.
在NS2平台下的仿真结果表明,与传统算法相比,改进算法的路由开销减少约50%,包投递率增加约5%。
参考来源 - AODV路由协议的本地修复算法·2,447,543篇论文数据，部分数据来源于NoteExpress
特别在大规模的网络环境下，它的优点超过它在路由开销方面的表现。
We want to point out that SAANIMRA has many more advantages than its routing overhead's disadvantages in large scale networks.
完全集中式和完全分布式的信任模型也存在路由开销太大、内存不足和计算能力有限等问题。
Fully distributed trust models are also not suitable because they have limited computing capacity and memory and so on.
仿真结果表明这两种多径技术都能显著减少协议的路由开销，且IDSR-2的路由开销更小。
Simulation results show that both IDSR-1 and IDSR-2 can reduce routing overheads significantly. And the routing overheads of IDSR-2 are smaller than IDSR-1's.
应用推荐