霍布斯和洛克的社会契约论的差异表现为逻辑起点、契约内容、契约效力三个方面。
The Social Contracts of Hobbes and Locke have three aspect difference as logical beginning, contract content and contract potency.
本文拟从契约效力的根源着手分析，从比较法的角度对合同形式及其欠缺的法律效力进行探析。
The present paper aims to analyze the root of the power that a contract has, and probe into the form of a contract and the legal power that it is short of based on a comparison.
这个协议就像各方之间的契约，而且可以成为事实上的具有法律效力的合同。
This agreement is like a contract between the parties, and can, in fact, be a legal contract.
应用推荐