如果他们决定投资第一眼看上去像是石板砖的变色瓷砖,因为这让他们高兴,那么我们凭什么去否定他们的选择呢?
If they decide to invest in color-changing tile that looks like slate at first glance, because it makes them happy, then who are we to deny their choices?
也不要试图去否定中国文化而拥护美国文化。
Never attempt to deny Chinese culture in favor of American culture.
事实上,任谁也没有办法去否定其存在的可能性。
And the rejection of this motif or this idea in Genesis 1 is pointed and purposeful. It's demythologization.
但《创世纪》第一章中对此模式或观点的否定,是明显且有目的的,它是一种去传奇化的叙述。
If the answer turns out to be no, it's going to take some sustained argument to settle it one way or the other.
如果答案是否定的,它将需要更有力的论据,去证明出个所以然
Now, if we push the dualist to explain what is it about free will that rules out the possibility that we are merely physical objects, I think the natural suggestion to spell out the argument goes like this, and this is where we were at the end of last time.
现在如果我们让二元论者去解释,什么是自由意志,它又是如何否定,人仅仅是物理实体这种可能性的,我认为他们自然会这样,阐述这个论证,这是就我们在上节课结束时讲到的内容
应用推荐