I offer this idea here not so much in the mindset of "Do it this way, rather than in a database," but as a design alternative you can use — or not use, as you choose.
在这里提供这个思路并不是建议您“采用这种方式,而不使用数据库”,这只是一种可供选择的方式,是否采用它由您决定。
This can still be done but I find it hard to use this wizard since it represents the EJB 2.0 relationship which is not described in terms of UML.
现在仍旧可以这样做,但我发现使用这个向导是非常困难的,因为它所表现的 EJB 2.0 的关系没有依据 UML 来描述。
You have said this in different ways in most of your talks and I find this awfully difficult, not only to grasp the idea, the depth of it but the feeling of quiet emptiness, if I can use that word.
在大多数讲话中你用不同方式说过这些,但是我发现这很难做到,不光是理解这个想法以及它的深度很难,而且理解安静的空无感觉也很难,如果我可以用这个词的话。
printf I have my includes, standard IO's; so I can use print F, but then I had this thing called a prototype.
我包含了标准输入输出文件,所以我可以使用,然后我有这个原型。
And then, people discover, "Well, this is interesting but how can I use it?"
之后人们发现,“恩,这很有趣但我们怎么用呢?“
应用推荐