科学是价值中性的吗?
不同于很多现代理论家,柏拉图认为,对世界和人类事务作“中性”或者“不作价值判断”的描述无论是否可取,都是根本不可能的。
In contrast to many modern theoreticians, Plato did not think that a "neutral" or "value-free" description of the world and human affairs is possible, let alone desirable.
到目前为止我阐述的前提是,生命价值的“中性容器理论。”
We could say that what I've been presupposing up to this point "is the" neutral container theory "of the value of life."
We could say that what I've been presupposing up to this point " is the "neutral container theory" of the value of life.
到目前为止我阐述的前提是,生命价值的“中性容器理论。
I can't bring myself to believe it, I have some sympathies for valuable container theories, but I also have some sympathy for neutral container theories.
我无法让自己去相信它,我有点赞同有价值容器理论,但是我也有点赞同中性容器理论。
And what we now see is that-- to see whether that could be the case or not, we've got to get clear in our own minds about whether we believe in a neutral container theory, ... a positive, valuable container theory or-- and among those, between a fantastic and a modest container theory.
现在我们可以看到-,情况是不是这样,我们就要想清楚,我们相信的是中性容器理论,是积极的有价值容器理论还是-,有价值容器理论中的,理想容器理论或保守容器理论。
应用推荐