王海的家人，也早已接纳了刘向梅。
在刘向眼中：书犹药也。
1997年，刘向梅终于和那个男人离了婚。
刘向梅的母亲翁声菊说：我怕女儿上当受骗。
Sound Ju Yung Liu Xiangmei's mother said: "I was afraid his daughter deceived."
刘向梅吃了一惊：在我老家，就只能种地，你哪行啊？
Liu Xiangmei taken aback: "In my hometown, they can only farm the land, and you like what you do ah?"
今晚孔刘向一位结婚10年后将要做妈妈的听众表示祝贺。
Tonight, Ggong congratulate a listener who will be a mom after married for 10 years.
西汉末年刘向校书，是一次长达二十多年的群体性的工作。
The collation of ancient books by Liu Xiang of the late Western Han Dynasty was a collective project that lasted for over 20 years.
不久，医生告诉刘向梅，她患的只是普通的胃病，并非食道癌。
Soon, the doctor told Liu Xiangmei, she was suffering from stomach just an ordinary, not esophageal cancer.
1990年，儿子出生了，刘向梅和丈夫一起到南阳城里打工。
In 1990, his son was born, Liu Xiangmei and her husband went to Nanyang city work.
还没唱完，刘向梅就哭了，漂泊十多年，她终于感到找到了依靠的港湾。
Not yet finished, Liu Xiangmei cried, wandering over a decade, she finally was found to depend on the harbor.
救援队指挥刘向阳表示：“我认为这对(人们如何看待)中国有好处。”
Liu Xiangyang, who commands the rescue corps, said: "I believe this is good for [how people perceive] China."
这些材料，来源非常广泛，而刘向对这些材料的处理和运用，形式又多种多样。
The source of these materials is very extensive and there are varied ways in treating and using these materials.
该章即对书中的评议方式进行了分类研究，并从评议入手分析刘向的一些思想观念。
The writer in this chapter conducts the classified research to its appraisal way, and analyzes Liu Xiang's some ideas from it.
刘向编撰《说苑》，是把其当作“谏书”使用的，始终抱着一种“昧死以进谏”的心态。
Liu Xiang used his work Shuo Yuan (Garden of Saying) as a remonstrance. From the very beginning, he had the mentality of presenting admonishment at the risk of death.
刘向、刘歆父子所编辑校正的“六艺”、诸子百家、诗赋等，篇目明晰，思想宗旨详明而大观。
"Six Arts", various schools of Masters, the poetry and so on, edited and corrected by Liu Xiang and his son Liu Xin, are lucid in writing and elaborate in thoughts.
刘向、刘歆父子长期的校书工作实践造就了他们在目录学方面的成就。刘氏父子留下的图书整理研究遗产至今仍有借鉴作用。
Liu Xiang and his son Liu Xin's long-term proofreading practice resulted in their achievements in bibliography, which is still a source of reference for the modern people.
正是司马迁、刘向对待战国纵横家所述史事的不同态度和处理的不同方法成为决定二书在记载战国史实方面优劣的根本性原因。
The radical reason in appraising the two books in the historical facts was the authors attitude about the historical facts narrated by personates at War period.
正是司马迁、刘向对待战国纵横家所述史事的不同态度和处理的不同方法成为决定二书在记载战国史实方面优劣的根本性原因。
The radical reason in appraising the two books in the historical facts was the authors attitude about the historical facts narrated by personates at War period.
应用推荐