Incidental Vocabulary Learning; Involvement Load Hypothesis; Writing; Reading;
词汇附带习得； 任务投入量假设；写作；阅读；
The hypothesis claimed that the higher the involvement load, the better the retention of the target words.
该假设认为“任务引发的投入量”越高，该任务对附带词汇习得的效果越好。
Tasks with higher involvement load are generally more effective for IVA than tasks with lower involvement load.
专注量高的学习任务比专注量低的学习任务更加有效地促进了词汇的附带习得。
Reading tasks with different involvement load exert influences on the incidental acquisition of English vocabulary.
不同投入量的阅读任务对英语词汇附带习得有一定的影响。
Also an output task can make vocabulary knowledge last longer than an input task when their involvement load is the same.
另外，投入量相同时，输出任务也比输入任务使词汇知识保持得更久。
Will Tasks with a higher involvement load be more effective for vocabulary retention than tasks with a lower involvement load?
是否投入量高的任务会比投入量低的任务导致更有效的词汇附带习得?。
Though all the reviewed literature either fully or partially supported the Involvement Load Hypothesis, the findings of the present study lent no support to it.
尽管现有文献的发现或完全支持或部分支持投入量假说，但是，本研究结果完全不支持这一假说。
Though all the reviewed literature either fully or partially supported the Involvement Load Hypothesis, the findings of the present study lent no support to it.
尽管现有文献的发现或完全支持或部分支持投入量假说，但是，本研究结果完全不支持这一假说。
应用推荐