Why does Hume have to be wrong?
为什么休谟就得是错的呢？
Hume in many ways follows Hobbes.
休谟在很多方面都承袭于霍布斯。
休谟并不这么认为。
We've talked about Hume before in class.
我们之前在课上讨论过休谟。
We've talked about Hume before in class, right?
我们之前在课上讨论过休谟，对吧？
But Adams and Hume Shared some important traits.
但亚当斯和休姆的个性中也有重要的共性。
And the empiricists are Locke, Berkeley and Hume.
经验主义者有洛克，柏克莱和休谟。
Philprof: He read Hume and woke from his dogmatic slumber.
哲学系教授：他阅读了休谟的哲学理论，并从他的教条主义睡梦中醒悟过来。
Now in many ways Hume can be seen as building on Newton and Locke.
现代很多观点认为休谟承袭于牛顿和洛克。
Even David Hume, a famous Scottish empiricist, paid the occasional visit.
甚至著名的苏格兰经验主义哲学家大卫·休谟也偶尔来此做客。
So that is taken by Hume to be a model for how science in general can operate.
休谟在理解一般科学是如何运作的问题上承袭了这个模式。
So it's just an example of the kind of matter of fact that Hume is talking about.
这只是关于休谟讨论物质事实的其中一个例子而已。
And by moral evidence, Hume means inductive reasoning, reasoning from experience.
关于道德证据，休谟认为是归纳的推理，推理则来自于经验。
Hume pointed out we couldn't find inevitability and universality among the consciousness.
休谟指出在知觉中找不到必然性与普遍性。
Physically, Adams was a striking contrast to the gentle, slightly rumpled, professorial Hume.
从外表看，亚当斯与文雅的、衣着略显凌乱、学者派头的休姆形成了鲜明对比。
When he was young, Hume wrote a book arguing against Locke's idea of an original social contract.
休谟年轻时写过一本书，驳斥洛克关于原始社会契约的观点。
Well here is a passage from a letter from a gentleman to his friend in Adumbral that Hume wrote in 1775.
这里有一段文章,是休谟于1775年写给他在阿杜巴拉一位朋友的书信。
When Adams showed up at the lunch, John Hume encouraged me to go over and shake hands with him, so I did.
当亚当斯出现在午宴上时，约翰·休姆怂恿我过去和他握手，我这样做了。
That's a summary of the part one argument where Hume says that all factual inferences is found on experience.
这是第一个争论的总结，休谟在里面提出了所有事实推理都基于经验。
Since Hume, the problem of induction had been a puzzle that baffled western empiricist scientists and philosophers.
自休谟以来，归纳问题一直是困扰西方经验主义科学家和哲学家的难题。
As the issue presented by Hume, scientific rationality is a puzzle for philosophers in modern philosophy of science.
在当代科学哲学中，科学合理性问题如同休谟归纳问题一样，是一个让哲学家寝食难安的问题。
Two hundred years earlier, British philosopher David Hume wrote, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”
200年前，英国哲学家大卫•休谟在书中写到“智者斟酌事实来确定自己的信念。”
"Una," left, plays a Hume character from the massively multiplayer RPG Final Fantasy XI. "Saya" plays a Taru-Taru from the same game.
左边的“Una”饰多人在线角色扮演游戏《最终幻想11》的人类，“Saya”饰来自同一游戏的塔鲁塔鲁族。
Ok, the last few slides I am just going to summarize very quickly, many people have attempted to answer Hume and all sorts of different ways.
还有最后几张幻灯片我很快地总结下，很多人尝试以不同的方式来回答休谟的问题。
You may find it difficult to understand the thought of Hume, and if you have no philosophical training its implications will doubtless escape you.
你会发现很难理解休姆的思想，而且如果你没有受到过哲学训练，毫无疑问，你将无法理解它的含义。
We have been fortunate enough to obtain the services of Mr. Hume Roberts, a distinguished professor from Britain, to lecture to us this afternoon.
今天下午，我们有幸请到英国知名教授休姆·罗伯茨先生来为我们开一次讲座。
If forced to choose between two vices, luxury and sloth, David Hume would have preferred luxury, because to banish it without curing sloth would only diminish industry.
如果被迫在奢侈和懒惰两害中取其一，大卫·休谟会选择奢侈，因为禁止奢侈而不消除懒惰，只会减少勤奋。
If forced to choose between two vices, luxury and sloth, David Hume would have preferred luxury, because to banish it without curing sloth would only diminish industry.
如果被迫在奢侈和懒惰两害中取其一，大卫·休谟会选择奢侈，因为禁止奢侈而不消除懒惰，只会减少勤奋。
应用推荐