It seems like if Linux happens to pick the right thread to go on #1, it's good; but it can also pick the wrong one, and then it's very bad, resulting in a throughput of only 3.7e7 bits/second.
如果Linux碰巧选择了 #1上的正确线程，则可以正常工作；但是它也可能选择了错误的线程，如果那样则情况会非常糟糕，其吞吐量仅为 3.7e7位每秒。
The goal is to put together a list that tells you 1 what the chances are that something will go wrong, 2 how bad it might be if something does go wrong and 3 when things might go wrong.
这个列表的目的是告诉你：1 .什么消息有可能使形势变糟；2 .如果变糟了，会糟糕到什么程度；3 .什么时候可能变糟。
It's too negative to expect things to go wrong, they said. However: it's only negative if you see it as negative. If you judge it as bad.
很多朋友说，希望事情变得糟糕，这也太悲观了。但是，其实仅仅当你认为它是悲观的时候，它才是悲观的，仅仅因为你觉得它不好。
When things go wrong, they remind themselves that a bad day is just one day, and they keep hope that tomorrow or next week or next month will be better.
当事情乱了套，他们会提醒自己，糟糕的一天也只是一天而已，他们仍然会对明天或下周，或下个月充满希望，相信一切会好起来。
I know what you mean. Little things will go wrong. And it makes the whole program seem bad.
我知道你的意思，出问题的都是小毛病。那样会使整个程序看起来很糟糕。
Having everything to go wrong in advance, and you won't feel quite so bad when it does.
你事先把会出错的情况都想到了，那么当发生时，你就不会感到太糟糕了。
Moral valuation should go along a value continuum instead of a dichotomy of right and wrong and of good and bad.
道德评价应当循着价值连续统而非对错好坏的二元对立而进行。
They made bad decisions. ' If that's the lesson learned - and maybe I'm opinionatinghere - but I think that's the wrong direction to go.
或许我是在这里发表个人见解，但是，假如我们学到的教训就是这些的话，我认为我们就错了。
About scoring goals and being the go-to-player I – not on a bad way, don't get me wrong – I'm past that. I'm more now of the mind making the team play better, if you know what I mean;
在墨西哥一场季前赛后，亨利接受赛后采访时说道，“我并不是说这样不好，别误会，不过我已经过了那个阶段，那个进球不断，承担终结者角色的阶段。
About scoring goals and being the go-to-player I – not on a bad way, don't get me wrong – I'm past that. I'm more now of the mind making the team play better, if you know what I mean;
在墨西哥一场季前赛后，亨利接受赛后采访时说道，“我并不是说这样不好，别误会，不过我已经过了那个阶段，那个进球不断，承担终结者角色的阶段。
应用推荐