But why, just because it is a sensitive soul, should it be allowed to pass away?
但是，为什么仅仅因为它是一个敏感的灵魂，就应该让它死去呢？
That's the eternal debate: should it be the learner's responsibility, that of his employer, or of the state?
这是一个永恒的争论：这个责任应当是谁的，学习者、雇主的还是国家的？
Why should it be put off till next month?
为什么非要挨到下个月不可？
现在应该做些什么呢？
How often should it be updated?
多久需要更新一次呢？
But should it be used in this way?
但是应该这样做吗？
Nor should it be difficult to implement.
推行应该也不会困难。
What language should it be written in?
小说是用什么语言来写的呢？
Should it be a serif or a sans serif for example?
比如说，它应该是一个衬线字体还是一个无衬线字体呢？
Should it be the biggest of the EU's new members?
它能成为欧盟最大的新成员吗？
Should it be interactive or should it be one-way?
它是互动的还是单方面？
Should it be the central, focal point or live at the edges?
它应该是中心，联络点或者活跃在边缘地带？
How urgent is its need for cash and how should it be raised?
该公司对现金的需求有多么急迫，它又该如何筹集这些现金？
If a task is not successfully completed, should it be tried again?
如果任务没有成功完成，是否要重新再来？
And if a debt shouldn't be recorded at cost, how should it be recorded?
如果一笔债务不是根据其成本来记录，那么又该如何记录这笔债务呢？
But if a company is too big to fail, should it be considered too big to exist?
如果一间公司大到不能倒，那是否也意味着它大到根本不该存在？
Should it be the date or the size of the document, pertinence to the case or another?
是文旦过的日期还是规格，与这个例子相关或其他的？
Of course ,the bank has the option of enforcing the rule should it be necessary .
当然啦，如果必要的话，银行是有权利按照这一条规定来做的。
Why should it be taboo to talk about equal pay or a gender balance in the workplace?
为什么在工作场合讨论平等薪资或性别均衡是一件忌讳的事情？
The question is: if that node is not actually being displayed at the moment, where should it be displayed?
问题是：如果此刻实际上并没有显示那个节点，那么应该在哪里显示它？
For how many hours a week should history be taught in schools, and to what age should it be made compulsory?
一周要规定多长时间学习历史和在什么年龄一定要学习历史？
Or should it be the investors, who bought these stocks when, in hindsight, the risks seemed clear enough?
或者是那些购买了事后风险似乎足够明晰的股票的投资者吗？
The retreat to a new level of risk was never going to be orderly or free of casualties. Neither should it be.
回归新层级风险的过程从来不会是井然有序或是毫无损害的，而且也不该如此。
Should we value processes and tools more, and if so, should it be at the detriment of individuals and interactions?
我们是不是应该更重视流程和工具？如果是的话，这是否会损害个体和交互？
Should we value processes and tools more, and if so, should it be at the detriment of individuals and interactions?
我们是不是应该更重视流程和工具？如果是的话，这是否会损害个体和交互？
应用推荐