在中国，家庭储蓄率超过20%。
政策的改变也可以帮助上调储蓄率。
他认为储蓄率可能超过10%。
个人储蓄率是个很不靠谱的度量方法。
货币可能在高储蓄率中扮演重要角色。
The currency likely plays a role alongside high saving rates.
它可能增加了中国的储蓄率。
如果有必要，储蓄率或者退休日将被调整。
If necessary the savings rate or the retirement date may have to change.
一个更加乐观的观点是高储蓄率只是暂时的。
A more optimistic view is that the saving glut is temporary.
你知道自己的年储蓄率是多少吗？
中国的储蓄率在世界排名靠前。
The saving rates in China are some of the highest in the world.
美国的储蓄率目前为止已经增长了4个百分点。
这就是高增长和高储蓄率之所以至关重要的原因。
美国家庭的储蓄率几乎为零。
个人储蓄率自从去年以来已经有所上升。
The personal savings rate has been rising over the past year.
储蓄率的比值是净数值。
而与之相对的是美国家庭的储蓄率几乎为零。
储蓄率会进一步上升。
他们拥有大量的资产因为他们所处的社会有着高的储蓄率。
They have plenty of funds because the societies they operate in have high saving rates.
换句话说，中国储蓄率上升与汇率没有关系。
In other words, it has nothing to do with the exchange rate.
世界银行最近的一份研究报告表明中国总的储蓄率是44%。
A recent paper by the World Bank suggests that China's total saving rate is 44%.
储蓄率：10%。
如果他们非要设定什么指标范围，也该是成员国的国民储蓄率。
If they set any target ranges it should be for members' national saving rates.
1965年，美国的净国民储蓄率和国内投资率大概都是15%。
In 1965 its rates of net national saving and net domestic investment were roughly 15%.
甚至储蓄率很高的东亚国家，消费率都保持在65%以上。
The consume rate is above 65% in those east Asian countries which having high save rate.
此联系貌似有理，中国9- 10%的年增长与其高储蓄率便是一例。
The link sounds plausible: take China's regular 9-10% annual growth and its high savings rate.
在危机之前，美国的可比储蓄率大约为3％，最近几个月则为6％。
The comparable rate in the U.S. was about 3% before the crisis, and 6% in recent months.
在美国，最近几年里，就是大家的收入都增加，可是储蓄率反而减低了。
That is why, in recent years , people are earning more but their savings have dropped.
虽然家庭储蓄率依然为负，但是已经从7月的-0.8%上升到9月的-0.2%。
The household saving rate, although still negative, rose from –0.8% in July to – 0.2% in September.
虽然家庭储蓄率依然为负，但是已经从7月的-0.8%上升到9月的-0.2%。
The household saving rate, although still negative, rose from –0.8% in July to – 0.2% in September.
应用推荐