• We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.

    我们可以说,伊的观点,本质上是葛玛观点的改写,比如说视域的融合。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • As you'll see when we return to Iser after I've said a few things about Hirsch, this, as you'll see, is the fundamental difference between Gadamer and Iser.

    正如你们所看到的,当我谈论了赫施的问题之后,又回到了伊,这就是葛玛和伊的明显不同。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • In other words, Iser is no more an historicist than Gadamer is but insists rather on the mutual exchange of prejudice between the two horizons in question.

    换句话说就是,伊并不比葛玛更历史主义,但他相反却坚持在两个有争执的视域中,偏见的互换。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定