Because we've just sat in lecture and you've told us we're not being rational if we pick a high number.
因为我们刚刚上过课,你告诉我们选大数的人是不理性的
He was seen as a sexual renegade out to destroy the conception of people as good and rational and pure beings.
他被认为是支持性本能论的,其观点试图毁掉,人是善良理性而又纯粹的这一概念。
You kill enough guys to achieve your goal and if you're still rational you take the rest prisoner.
杀戮足够让战争得以胜利的人,如果你还有理性的话,你会将剩下的战俘抓起来
We need not just that you're all rational players, not just that you know each other's rational, but you know everyone else's rational.
不仅需要你们都是理性的参与人,不仅需要你们知道对方是理性的,而且必须知道所有人都是理性的
How is it that some people came to acquire this capacity for rational self-control that is necessary for freedom ? and others seem to lack it?
为何有些人,会拥有这种理性自控的能力,那也是自由的必备条件,但有些人却似乎不具备这种能力?
People are bodies that can think, that can communicate, that are rational, that can plan, that can feel things, that can be creative, and so forth and so on.
人是可以思考,可以互相交流的肉体,他有理性,可以规划,可以感知,有创新等各种能力
So to get this slice, this next slice here, I need rationality; as some of you know that's widely criticized in the social sciences these days.
要剔除这个范围,需要理性因素,可能有些人知道,这一点最近社会科学界广受质疑
Fear, you will remember is associated with the desire for security, order, rationality, and peace. Pride is connected with the love of glory, honor, recognition and ambition.
要知道,人的恐惧是与其内心对安全,秩序,理性与和平的渴望联系在一起的,而自豪是与荣耀,声誉,志向与他人的认可,联系在以一起的。
that expresses the will of the majority, the will of the greater number be rendered compatible with the needs of philosophy and the claims to respect ? only reason and a better argument?
众人意志的民主,及大多数人的意志,能够兼容,哲学需求,及尊重理性,及进阶辩论的诉求吗?
one important argument was,or really family of arguments was, you need to believe in souls in order to explain why bodies are animated, why people are rational,how they can have personalities, how they can be creative,and so forth.
一个或一系列很重要的说法就是,要相信灵魂的存在才能解释身体的活动,为什么人会有理性和人格,为什么有创造力,诸如此类。
Rational choices by rational players, can lead to bad outcomes.
理性人的理性选择造成了次优的结果
Are we right to assume that people are rational?
人是理性的这个假设是否正确
According to the physicalist view, a person is just a body that can do all of those things: can reflect, can be rational, can communicate, can make plans, can fall in love, can write poetry.
根据物理主义的观点,人是一个可以做以下事情的肉体,可以思考,可以理性,可以与人交流,可以制定计划,可以彼此相爱,可以写诗
And there are many people in sort of common sense who might think "Gee, if only I could just use my rationality, think reasonably and rationally and not let my emotions guide my behavior I'd be much better off."
有许多有常识的人,也许会想,要是我能用我的理性,合理思考,不让情感指导行为,我会做得更好“
I mean I know you all know each other because you've met at Yale, but you also know each other well enough to know that not everyone in the room is rational, and you're pretty sure that not everyone knows that you're rational and so on and so forth.
我的意思是,我知道你们互相都认识,因为你们都在耶鲁大学念书,但你们都那么熟悉了就会发现,并不是所有的人都是理性的,而且你很确定并非所有人都知道,你是理性,以此类推
I assume what Socrates means by that is though each individual will, each of us, embody all three features of soul, appetite, spirit, and reason, only one of these will be the dominate trait in each of us.
我假定苏格拉底是指,虽然每个个体,我们每一个人,都将体现灵魂,欲望,意志与理性的全部三种特质,而仅有其中一项,会主宰我们每一个人。
应用推荐