Firms in perfect competition are price takers: they don't particularly have to worry about the actions of their competitors.
这些企业是价格接受者,他们不必担心,他们的竞争对手的策略
Okay, so now more interestingly, we leave a little gap here, what if the other guy is pricing above costs?
现在更有趣的来了,我们这边留一点空白,如果对手的定价比成本高呢
The first one is Dr. Marvin Chun who teaches the Introduction to Psychology course in the fall and is my competition.
第一名是马文·春博士,他会在秋季教授心理学导论课程,也是我的竞争对手
Our competitors were using that to subsidize competing with us in the client market.
我们的对手以它为手段,来增加客户端市场的竞争力。
If you have a product and your competitor has a product and you put sugar in yours, people are going to like it better.
如果你和你的竞争对手同样生产一批食品,而你的加糖了,人们会更喜欢你的产品
They start getting into the Mediterranean and that scares the hell out of their commercial rivals.
他们开始进入了地中海地区,而这一举动把他们的竞争对手也吓得够呛
We own that property now, we own their equipment, and therefore we won the battle.
我们赢得了财产,赢得了对手的装备,因此,我们赢得了战役
So Kramnik's simply treating this as an awesome opponent.
克拉姆尼克当时只是把它当作一个强劲的对手
There are a lot of perspectives discernible or extractable from this treatise, Areopagitica, from which the fallen state seems in so many ways, maybe in every way, superior to its unfallen counterpart.
有很多角度都可以从这个专著《论出版自由》中辨别和提取,出来,从很多方面或是一方面来说,从没落的政府比其他未没落的对手优越中来。
Why? Because no matter how the other firm, your competitor, prices you might have an incentive to undercut them.
为什么,因为不管你对手怎么定价,你总有想削弱他们的动机
I get all the voters right on top of me at position 1 and she gets everyone else, is that right?
我得到选择立场1的10%选票,对手得到剩余90%的选票,对吗
The payoff of 2 against 3 is all the people at 1, all the people at 2, so it's 20%.
如果对手选3而我选2我会得到,立场1和2的全部选票,一共20%
Conversely, if there was probability 1 that the other guy is going to choose Right, and I choose Up, then I get 0.
相反,如果对手,选择右的概率为1,并且我选的是上,那我的收益为零
Against 3: so now we're comparing my choosing 1 versus 3 and my choosing 2 versus 3.
对手选立场3,现在来计算我选立场1对手选立场3,或者我选立场2对手选立场3的情况
And we've already agreed that if I think it's equally likely they're going to choose right and left, that there's a probability ?
而且我们已经计算过了,如果我觉得对手,选左选右的概率相同,即他们选右的概率为1/2时
And we know that Down does best if I think it was equally likely that the person was going to choose Left and Right.
我们还知道如果我们认为对手,选左或者是右的可能性相同的情况下,下是此情况下最好的策略
That's illegible, but what it says is rational and knowledge that other people are rational.
这也是有点拗口,但他的意思就是,理性的你知道呢的对手也是理性的
Both firms have an incentive to undercut the other firm, driving down profits for both.
每个企业都有削弱对手的动机,最后他们的利润都下降了
Yeah, okay while we're here, why don't we do the same for my pair?
好了,我们再把对手的情况也写下来
We mean that if these are your payoffs, no matter what your pair does, you attain a higher payoff from choosing Alpha, than you do from choosing Beta.
我们说如果这是你的收益,那么不论你的对手选什么,你选择α总会比选择β,得到更好的收益
Well now I need to be rational, I need to know that other people are rational, and I need to know that other people know that other people are rational.
我自己已经是理性的了,我也知道对手也是理性的,我还需要知道对手们明白,他们的对手也是理性的
But look at my opponent. My opponent's Alpha dominates her Beta.
但是对我的对手来说,选α优于β
What about my expected payoff from choosing Middle against , so in this case where I think it's equally likely that my opponents going to choose Left or Right?
那我在情况下,选中的预期收益是什么呢,在此情况下我依然认为,对手选左选右的可能性相同
It's my belief that the other guy's going to choose Right.
也就是我关于对手选右概率的信念
We have to consider other possible positions of my opponent.
我们还要考虑对手的其他选择
What I want to do is I want to draw a picture here, in which on the horizontal axis, I'm going to put the probability of the other guy choosing Right.
我要在这里画一张图,坐标系的横轴,表示对手选右的概率
The assumption that your opponents are being rational as well.
你需要假设你对手也是理性的
The gamble was our wings will crush their wings and turn in on them from behind and from the side, and set them a running before they break through our middle.
赌的是在敌军突破我军的中路之前,我军的两翼摧毁敌军两翼,从侧翼和后方合围对手,使之四处逃散
All right, so you wrote out these squares, you realized what your partner was going to do, and responded to that.
这么说你也写下了这些矩阵,你分析出了对手的选择并依此做出的选择
So the probability is 0 of the other guy choosing Left is, the same as, let's try it again.
同样的如果对手选左的概率是0,那也就是说,重新来
应用推荐