If we grant that to Plato, he thinks we've got an argument for the immortality of the soul.

如果我们同意柏拉图这个观点,他认为我们就有了支持灵魂不灭性的论据

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think or not?

那如果派克的确同意了，你觉得杀他是正当的吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So Socrates has what he wants, once we give him premise number two, that the eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical.

所以如果我们同意他的前提二,苏格拉底就得到了他想要的,前提二说永恒,非现实的事物,只能被永恒,非现实的事物认知

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So if he came up with the idea, that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence in morally then it would be okay.

所以如果是他自己提出的，除非他是在这种情况下的同意,才能确信说，道德上没问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

It might be improved by presenting other views better and more objectively, since Kagan always ended a particular line of reasoning by defeating the argument if he didn't agree with it.

讲课效果会提升如果更好的,并更客观的展示其他观点，因为卡刚通常通过击败一个论点,来结束特定的推理，如果他不同意它。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It would be different if he consented."

如果他同意就是另一回事了“

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选