If we grant that to Plato, he thinks we've got an argument for the immortality of the soul.
如果我们同意柏拉图这个观点,他认为我们就有了支持灵魂不灭性的论据
Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think or not?
那如果派克的确同意了,你觉得杀他是正当的吗?
So Socrates has what he wants, once we give him premise number two, that the eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical.
所以如果我们同意他的前提二,苏格拉底就得到了他想要的,前提二说永恒,非现实的事物,只能被永恒,非现实的事物认知
So if he came up with the idea, that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence in morally then it would be okay.
所以如果是他自己提出的,除非他是在这种情况下的同意,才能确信说,道德上没问题。
It might be improved by presenting other views better and more objectively, since Kagan always ended a particular line of reasoning by defeating the argument if he didn't agree with it.
讲课效果会提升如果更好的,并更客观的展示其他观点,因为卡刚通常通过击败一个论点,来结束特定的推理,如果他不同意它。
It would be different if he consented."
如果他同意就是另一回事了“
应用推荐