• But TEFRA was coupled with a promise by Tip O'Neil and Bob Dole that for every dollar in tax increases government spending would be cut by 3 dollars.

    但前提是,欧尼尔和鲍勃·杜尔必须承诺,每增税1美元,政府财政支出须减少3美元。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • I think it's kinda...you do it to both but right now, tax increase in 2011, 2012, 2013, etc. as what's on the books would be very bad for the economy.

    双管齐下当然不太现实,但目前来看,要是从2011年开始,按照经济理论,而一直往后增税的话,对经济可谓百害而无一利。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • He raised taxes certain on the top brackets a little bit.

    尽管克林顿对高收入人群适当了点

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • Go ahead and let the Bush tax cuts expire on the theory that the government needs extra revenues to cover the higher spending or should he try to ? make the Bush tax cuts permanent, Ken Judd?

    第一种是让布什减政策自动终结,然后增税,这个倒也在情在理,毕竟政府需要,额外加财政收入,来承担高额的财政支出,第二种是,采取措施,让该政策继续生效,肯·贾德,你怎么看?

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • And nobody knows, nobody believes that we can cut spending, right? -Somebody down the road has to pay the bills Somebody down the road has to pay the bills, either by cutting spending, cutting benefits or raising taxes.

    而几乎没人相信,政府能够成功节流,不是吗?,-那总得,有人来埋单啊,迟早要有人来为此埋单的,要么精简政府开支,削减福利,要么增税

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • .. But McCain is, McCain wants to increase... What you are saying effectively is the next president must raise taxes in a massive way Because you are saying you can only cut taxes if you cut spending.

    然而麦凯恩想要加。,那照你的意思,下届政府必须大幅增税了,毫无悬念,因为你说一旦减,就必须跟着精简开支。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定