But he wrote one of the most brilliant critiques of change, and what it can mean, any American ever wrote.
但他写了一部非常精彩的关于变革的评论,这是美国人所著同类作品中最出色的一部
But we have many all and kind of common birds.
但是我们有很多不同类的相似的鸟。
Takes one to know one; so, you can't be a Canadian and study Mexicans, because it takes one to know one.
同类才能互知,所以加拿大人就不能研究墨西哥人,因为只有同类才能互知
What's the point of this? Again, now that I can think about things recursively, I can similarly break things down into simpler versions of the same problem. It could be one version.
这些的意思是什么呢?再一次我想说,我既然能够以递归的方式思考了,那么我就可以简单地把问题,转化为更简单的同类问题。
Now unfortunately, the same companies are not around-- the companies that we had in 1871, hardly any of them even exist anymore.
不幸的是,与1871年的那些公司同类的公司,已经不存在了,这些公司几乎都不存在了
Now, it seems to me we can eliminate that a little bit by comparing it with various modern approaches to the same sorts of problems.
如今,在死亡的问题上,我们已经通过,与现代多种同类方法和问题的对比,解决一些了
And then finally we could add that--the idea that maybe with a lot of electronic basses and things like that that they play--they tend to play the bass just louder.
然后最后我们可以添加这个,一种很多电贝斯和其他同类乐器演奏的方式,倾向于将低音演奏得响亮一些。
Socrates seems to remain, even until the end, very much a kind of law unto himself while at the same time, again, providing Crito and others like him an example of rational and dignified obedience to the law.
苏格拉底一直到最后,似乎都保持着一种自我定义的法律,但同时,却也提供克里托及其它同类,一种理信,与庄严的服从法律范例。
Unfortunately, this thought, popular as it may be, that it takes one to know one, just seems false.
不幸的是,这样的想法,即同类者互知,可能很流行,但实际上是错误的
But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.
就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。
It does not take one to know one; to understand the truths about the French, you do not yourself need to be French.
这不需要同类互知,你不需要是法国人,才能了解法国人
I just reduced it to a smaller version of the same problem.
我刚刚把它简化为一个更小的同类问题,这就是我可以写出能解决更短字符串的例子。
Moving vans, all sorts of things of that nature.
还有搬家汽车等等同类事件。
But it takes one to know one is probably the most familiar way of putting the point.
同类的事物才能互相认知,也许这是说明这个观点最熟悉的方式
Well, we know the eternal forms; takes one to know one.
我们知道永恒的型相,并且知道同类互知
So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.
所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的
It doesn't normally take one to know one.
所以一般不需要同类才能互知
It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.
即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的
I take it the claim basically is that, to put it in more familiar language it takes one to know one.
我把那个看做是个断言,基本上是为了,用更熟悉的语言来阐述,只有同类才最了解彼此
Things of that nature.
等等同类问题。
slightly other kind of language that Plato uses at various points, "Likes are known by likes."
一种稍微不同的说法是,柏拉图在多个观点中所用到的,同类互知
Takes one to know one so the biologist must himself be a cat.
不过同类互知,那么这个生物学家他自己必须是猫
应用推荐