• But he wrote one of the most brilliant critiques of change, and what it can mean, any American ever wrote.

    但他写了一部非常精彩的关于变革的评论,这是美国人所著同类作品中最出色的一部

    耶鲁公开课 - 美国内战与重建课程节选

  • But we have many all and kind of common birds.

    但是我们有很多不同类的相似的鸟。

    喜欢鸟 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • Takes one to know one; so, you can't be a Canadian and study Mexicans, because it takes one to know one.

    同类才能互知,所以加拿大人就不能研究墨西哥人,因为只有同类才能互知

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • What's the point of this? Again, now that I can think about things recursively, I can similarly break things down into simpler versions of the same problem. It could be one version.

    这些的意思是什么呢?再一次我想说,我既然能够以递归的方式思考了,那么我就可以简单地把问题,转化为更简单的同类问题。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Now unfortunately, the same companies are not around-- the companies that we had in 1871, hardly any of them even exist anymore.

    不幸的是,与1871年的那些公司同类的公司,已经不存在了,这些公司几乎都不存在了

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Now, it seems to me we can eliminate that a little bit by comparing it with various modern approaches to the same sorts of problems.

    如今,在死亡的问题上,我们已经通过,与现代多种同类方法和问题的对比,解决一些了

    耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

  • And then finally we could add that--the idea that maybe with a lot of electronic basses and things like that that they play--they tend to play the bass just louder.

    然后最后我们可以添加这个,一种很多电贝斯和其他同类乐器演奏的方式,倾向于将低音演奏得响亮一些。

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • Socrates seems to remain, even until the end, very much a kind of law unto himself while at the same time, again, providing Crito and others like him an example of rational and dignified obedience to the law.

    苏格拉底一直到最后,似乎都保持着一种自我定义的法律,但同时,却也提供克里托及其它同类,一种理信,与庄严的服从法律范例。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • Unfortunately, this thought, popular as it may be, that it takes one to know one, just seems false.

    不幸的是,这样的想法,即同类者互知,可能很流行,但实际上是错误的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.

    就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • It does not take one to know one; to understand the truths about the French, you do not yourself need to be French.

    这不需要同类互知,你不需要是法国人,才能了解法国人

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I just reduced it to a smaller version of the same problem.

    我刚刚把它简化为一个更小的同类问题,这就是我可以写出能解决更短字符串的例子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Moving vans, all sorts of things of that nature.

    还有搬家汽车等等同类事件。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • But it takes one to know one is probably the most familiar way of putting the point.

    同类的事物才能互相认知,也许这是说明这个观点最熟悉的方式

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Well, we know the eternal forms; takes one to know one.

    我们知道永恒的型相,并且知道同类互知

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.

    所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It doesn't normally take one to know one.

    所以一般不需要同类才能互知

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.

    即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • I take it the claim basically is that, to put it in more familiar language it takes one to know one.

    我把那个看做是个断言,基本上是为了,用更熟悉的语言来阐述,只有同类才最了解彼此

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Things of that nature.

    等等同类问题。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • slightly other kind of language that Plato uses at various points, "Likes are known by likes."

    一种稍微不同的说法是,柏拉图在多个观点中所用到的,同类互知

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Takes one to know one so the biologist must himself be a cat.

    不过同类互知,那么这个生物学家他自己必须是猫

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定