It means that choosing position 2 always gives me a higher share of the vote than choosing position 1, no matter where the other candidate positions herself.

意味着选择立场2,会比选择立场1,获得更多的选票,无论另一个候选人如何选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we'll take another don't-take branch here.

所以我们将会在这里走到,另一个不应该选择的物品。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So suppose the other candidate has chosen position 1.

假设另一个候选人选择立场1

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And what he does and what his work does is basically explain why people choose to back one political party versus the other; why they choose to live one kind of life versus the other.

他的工作和作品的贡献在于解释了,人们为什么会选择一个党派反对另一个;,为什么会选择一种生活方式摒弃另一种。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

But then I asked another question, do you think trying to pick mutual funds, trying to find a mutual fund that will beat the market is a smart thing to do or not a smart thing to do?

但是接着我又问了另一个问题,你们认为选择共同基金,选择一种强于市场表现的共同基金,是不是明智之举呢

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

If you imagined a choice between this one gene that makes the animal choose to die and the other gene that makes an animal choose for its brothers to die, the gene that sacrifices the body it belongs to will make more copies in the future.

如果你想象做一个选择,一个基因让动物选择死亡,另一个基因让动物,选择为它的兄弟死亡，自我牺牲的基因,将来会复制更多自己。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So the other candidate has chosen position 1.

另一个候选人选择立场1

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So here's the straight line, and this line is the expected payoff to Player I from choosing Down as it depends on the probability that the other person chooses Right, and then once again, we can write down the equation.

这就是第三条直线了,它表示参与人I选择下获得的收益,是另一个参与人,选右概率的一个函数,对于这一条直线,我们依然能够给出方程式

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选