National Public Radio asked exactly this question in a survey a year or so ago and they got the following principal responses back.

国家公共广播电台问过,完全相同的问题,在一次一年前的民意调查中,他们得到了如下的回复

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

We'll loop back as we go through the class to questions about what's gone so horribly wrong, and more important, from a public health point of view, what can be done about it?

当所有的课都上完后我们会再回头看,到底是什么出了问题,更重要的是,从公共健康的角度来看,如何才能纠正这些错误呢

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

But the fact that this type of report the goverment published itself suggest that they are thinking about it and once it becomes part of the public discourse this typle of issue... some action is likely to follow.

政府自身愿意写出这种报告,从另一角度说明,他们在思考这个问题,一旦这个问题受到公共瞩目,这类问题。,就可能有人开始动手解决。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

But other people, in fact probably a larger percentage, default to the top option here: that these are personal health issues rather then public health issues; that people are making choices about what they eat, if they make bad choices it's their fault.

不过另一些人,确切说是很大一部分人,把问题归咎于以上几个选项,这是个人健康问题而不是公共健康问题,人们自由选择想吃的东西,即使做了不正确的选择也是他们自己的错

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

Those of you in public health and there are some grad students here have probably heard this discussion before, but you guys aside, can anybody guess what might be explaining this relationship over in the left hand side?

你们当中如果有公共卫生学院的或研究生,也许就听说过这个问题的讨论,但那时你们只是旁听,有人能猜到是什么原因,造成左边的这个曲线形状吗

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选