That is, most processes that we're concerned with, they'll happen with something held constant like pressure or temperature or maybe volume.
这句话是说我们所关注的大部分过程,发生的时候都是保持某个量为常数,比如压强,温度或者体积。
How ready can we be for this kind of endeavor, or is this something that really has to come at its own pace?
我们在超我之物降临时会准备好么,还是说我们对于这种灵感的来临毫无控制?
As I said earlier, that's an action plan, I'm certainly not going to second guess there are many action plan.
就像我刚才所说,这是一个行动计划,我当然不会去质疑这项计划,虽然说我们已经有很多的行动,计划。
So we ask very limited questions, which is why we brag about how accurately we can predict the future.
我们研究的问题是非常有限的,正因如此我们才敢自豪地说,我们能非常精确地预测未来
That is to say, how do we form the conclusion that we are interpreting something adequately, that we have a basis for the kind of reading that we're doing?
也就是说,当说到我们能够解读某个事物,或对正在进行的阅读有一定基础,我们是如何得出上述结论的?
Or, more generally, we'll worry about how should the fact that I'm going to die affect the way I live?
或者,更通俗的说,我们会担心我将死去这个事实,如何影响我的生活方式?
So we're just subtracting, in effect, zero, right, from the enthalpy of the product, but of course it's important have that established because the heat of formation is something you could measure, right?
所以从效果上说,我们只是,从生成物的焓中减去了零,但,是确立这一点很重要,因为生成热是,你能测量的东西,对吧?
So between b e, and b, between n and o, magnesium and aluminum, and then phosphorous and sulfur, what we see here is that we're kind of going down, or quite specifically, we are going down.
比如从铍到硼,从氮到氧,从镁到铝,从磷到硫,我们在这些地方看到有点下降,或者可以明确地说,我们确实在下降。
Perhaps we want to write like Shakespeare, maybe we want to be a writer like the great Old Testament prophet Isaiah. But the last thing we should be burdened with, Milton's suggesting here, is the fear of being late.
也许我们想向莎士比亚一样,也许想成为,伟大的旧约先知以赛亚,但弥尔顿说我们最不应该被,担心迟到所困。
Remember we said we design lists so that the access, no matter where it was on the list was of constant time.
记住我们说过我们创建了,一个列表它就是这么访问的,无论它在列表的哪个位置。
So Marcion said the only thing that should be scripture for us is not all that Jewish scripture. Get rid of that.
所以马吉安说我们的唯一圣典,不是犹太教圣典,把它扔掉吧。
Let's say this is a repurchase of some of your shares at market price, sending the same check, so what's the difference?
就说我们以市价购回你的一些股票,然后寄过去同一张支票,这有区别吗
So once again what this idea is this idea is you yourself should not play a dominated strategy.
所以再次强调,站在我们自己的立场上说,我们不应采用劣势策略
But some things seem to be indisputable, for instance, if I say we won the battle I can prove that to you most of the time.
但有些东西还是没有争议的,举个例子,我说我们赢得了战役,我可以证明这一点
The transparency effect is that we believe that we're more transparent than we are.
它是说我们以为,自己比实际中更容易看透。
How we are seen by others is a crucial cardinal part of Hobbes' moral psychology and each of us, he says, contain. These do not simply represent two classes of individuals, two classes of persons.
别人怎么看我们是霍布斯,道德心理学中重要的中心内容,他说我们每个人心中都有这两种情绪,这不仅代表了两个阶层的个体,两个阶层的人。
So the instinct of many cabinet officers and other senior officials is "Boy, when we take this to the president, let's see if we can reach some sort of 4 compromise, you know, you say 2, I say 4, let's just go tell the president 3 that we've agreed on 3."
所以许多内阁官员,还有其他高层的领导人的本能都是,我们把这个给总统处理之前,先看看我们能不能各自让步,比如你说2,我说,我们就告诉总统,我们都同意“
So specifically, what we're asking here is as we go across the periodic table, we want to consider which has the smaller ionization energy.
具体地说,我们这里要问的是,从周期表来看,你认为,哪一个元素的电离能更低。
Shelly Kagan So the only alternative seems to be to say that neither of us is Shelly Kagan.
所以唯一的选择是说我们都不是。
Simmias says we can't conclude that the soul is indestructible because we should not believe the subconclusion 4 invisible things can't be destroyed.
他说我们不能得出结论说,灵魂不朽或几乎不朽或其他什么,因为我们不该相信,4这个结论4,即无形的东西不可毁灭。
I think,as far as I can see,that the claim we all die alone, however we interpret it,just ends up being implausible or false.
在我看来,说我们全都会孤独而死,无论怎样解释都是不合理的,错误的。
And when we say bigger, remember this is not a classical description we're talking about.
当我们这里说大,记住我们说的不是经典的描述。
What we do is speak, and when we speak, of course, we say correctly that we "use" language, but we still need to know what language is and we need to understand the relationship between language and speech.
我们所说的,我们什么时候说,当然,说我们这是在使用语言,但是我们仍然要理解语言到底是什么,我们要理解语言和话语的关系。
Let's consider again an s orbital for argon, so let's say we're looking at the 1 s orbital for argon.
我们再考虑一次氩的s轨道,所以我们说我们在看氩的1s轨道。
And when we talk about size, I'm again just going to say the stipulation we're not talking about an absolute classical concept here, but in general we're going to picture it being much further away from the nucleus as we move up in terms of n.
当我们说到尺寸时,我们只是说――,经典的绝对的概念,而是它大约,离原子核有多远。
He's not saying that we've got it backwards.
他不是说我们把顺序弄反了。
So suppose, for example, we've got a chess-playing computer.
所以假如说我们有一个会下国际象棋的电脑
Until we say something more, it's not clear that we shouldn't just, all right, note it, store it away, and forget about it, just like the facts about the state capitals.
直到我们说了更多之前,也不一定说,我们不应该,记下它,把它收起来,然后忘记它,正如关于州首府的事实一样。
If that's right, if that's the right thing to say, then what we have to say is, "We don't need to appeal to souls in order to explain emotions and feelings.
如果这是正确的,如果这种说法正确,那么,我们不得不说,我们不需要诉诸灵魂来,解释情感和感觉
They should say we were simplifying unduly.
他们应该说我们过度地简化了人格理论。
应用推荐