So we can think about now doing bonding, and now we have four equal orbitals with one electronic each.
我们现在可以考虑成键了,现在我们有4个等价的轨道,每个上面有1个电子。
Well, if this bond has completely identically equal sharing of electrons, then this bond will be nonpolar.
如果一根键连的两个原子,对键上的电子吸引程度是完全等价的,那么这根键是非极性的。
But if I want to do it all in one shot, what is the equivalent step I should take?
但我如果想要一步完成,那我应该用什么样的等价步骤呢
So I want to mention also, these are exactly equivalent, they're equivalent in energy, they're equivalent in shape.
我要指出的是,它们是完全等价的,它们在能量上等价,在形状上等价。
So if you're going to discuss whether or not military conscription is equivalent to suppressing people's right to life, you shouldn't approach it that way.
所以如果你要讨论,征兵制度是否等价于压制人们的生命权,你不该这么说。
And so here do we see we can check for equality with zero.
然后这里我们可以检查与0等价的情况了。
So this is really the equivalent of this.
两式是等价的。
No, it's an exact formula.
不,这是精确等价的
For example, H2, N2, they are going to share the electrons uniformly, equally.
比方说,氢气,氮气,他们都无差别的,完全等价地共享电子。
And what it turns out is experimental evidence tells us that these two structures are equivalent.
而实验结果也告诉我们,这两种结构是等价的。
And, if they don't share equally, then the individual bonds might have different energies.
如果他们不是等价的共用,个别的键,可能有不同的键能。
Go ahead and implement with the person next to you a program that takes as input from the user an integer called F and prints out the answer of the Celsius equivalent.
继续和你旁边的人执行程序,取来自用户的整数F作为输入,然后打印出与之等价的摄氏温度的答案。
And, that's equal to the product of e the proton number times e.
正等价于,质子数乘以。
This is the equivalent to ray optics, isn't it?
这与X射线是等价的,是不是?
应用推荐