I've read through the same thing twenty times and I've missed something obvious. Someone who's never seen it before looks at and says, did you really mean to do this?

但是它们有一双旁观者之眼,我把同一段代码读上20遍,都会漏掉一些很明显的错误，从没看过这段代码的人会告诉我？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

More generally, Chomsky suggests that the law of effect when applied to humans is either trivially true, trivially or uninterestingly true, or scientifically robust and obviously false.

更一般的来讲，乔姆斯基认为应用在人类身上的效果律,要么是无效且毫无意义的正确假说，要么就是稳定且明显的错误假说。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

By the way, your text has a glaring error.

顺便说一下，教科书上有个很明显的错误。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

So what's one mistake that's apparent to some here?

所以这里的一个明显的错误是什么？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选