Although here, it's as if the government is electing by conscription certain citizens to go die for the sake of the whole.

尽管目前，好像是政府,在通过征兵制选择特定的公民,为了全体利益而死。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So if you're going to discuss whether or not military conscription is equivalent to suppressing people's right to life, you shouldn't approach it that way.

所以如果你要讨论,征兵制度是否等价于压制人们的生命权，你不该这么说。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

In the American Civil War,there was a draft, but you could avoid it by hiring somebody to take your place, if you were rich enough.

在美国内战期间，曾有过强制征兵，但是你可以让人代替你，如果你足够有钱的话。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I think if you look at conscription as the government picking out certain individuals to go fight in war, then that would be a violation of their natural right to life.

我想如果你把征兵制,视为政府挑选特定的个人去参战，那确实是对自然权利中生命权的侵犯。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

What about life? What about military conscription?

譬如生命，譬如征兵制，那又如何？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So the real question is how does he himself figure it out between " "I agree to give up my life, give up my property" when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact.

所以真正的问题是，他如何能自圆其说以下观点,“我同意放弃我的生命，放弃我的财产“,当他谈到税收制或征兵制时是这样说的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选