Let's just check. If my pair chooses Alpha, then my choosing Alpha yields 0, Beta -3: so Alpha would be better.

我们来验证下,如果我对手选α,我选α得0,选β得-3,所以选α更好

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

But if my pair chooses Beta then Alpha yields -1, Beta yields 1: in this case Beta would be better.

但是要是我对手选β我选α得-1,选β得1,此时选β更好

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

One says, leave any body near the Earth, it yields a force.

有人说,在地球表面的任何物体,都会受到力的作用

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

How do the prices and yields look at various points in time?

在不同的时点上,价格和收益会怎样变化呢

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

But we'd like a model that yields an outcome that looks-- that when you only have two firms looks somewhere between monopoly and perfect competition.

但我们想要一个模型能带来这样的结果,即,当只有两家公司时,一个介乎于垄断和完全竞争之间的情形

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And if Player I chooses bottom, then center yields 2, right yields 0: 2 is bigger than 0 again.

如果参与者I选择下,选中的收益是2,选右的收益是0,2大于0

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Player I chose top, center yields 3, right yields 0: 3 is bigger than 0.

如果参与者I选择上,选中的收益是3,选右的收益为0,3大于0

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So to say it in words, Player i's strategy "s'i" is strictly dominated by her strategy "si," if "si" always does strictly better -- always yields a higher payoff for Player i -- no matter what the other people do.

用文字来描述就是,参与人i的策略s'i严格劣于si,如果si总是更好的选择,即总能给参与人i带来更高的收益,而无论其他参与人怎么选

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We've identified the prices and yields of bonds of various maturities.

我们找出了各种不同期限债券的价格和收益

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选