• If we had this sort of progressive all-radical alteration, not just minimal alteration, but radical alterations of my memory, my beliefs, my desires, my tastes.

    如果我们持续经历剧烈变化,不只是最小的变化,而是自己的记忆,信仰,渴望,品味都发生剧烈变化。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • We're talking about like, if you didn't, even if you had all your data on your computer backed up on hard drive,

    如果你没有将你电脑里的数据备份到硬盘里,

    没有智能手机活不了 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • Now, if that was all we had to say about disgust, it wouldn't affect morality very much but we know that people can be seen as disgusting.

    如果我们只停留在情绪层面来讨论反感,那么它跟道德就没多大关系,但我们知道,我们可以把人看成令人反感的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • Okay, so if we had stopped the class after the first week where all we learned to do was to delete dominated strategies, we'd be stuck, we'd have nothing to say about this game and as I said before, this is the most important game, so that would be bad news for Game Theory.

    好了,如果我们只学了第一周的内容,即如果我们只学到了剔除劣势策略的话,我们没招了,我们无法解释这个博弈,但我之前说了,这是个很重要的博弈,这对博弈论来说可不是个好消息

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • - After all, if you knew-- suppose we had the birthmarks that told you -- when you were going to die-- if you had that kind of a birthmark, you would face your entire life with the burden of knowing, I've got 48 years left, 47 years left, 50 years left.

    毕竟,如果你知道-,假设我们有个胎记能告诉你,你什么时候去世-,如果你有那种胎记,你一辈子都将面对那种知情的压力,我还剩48年,还剩47年,还剩50年。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • We know that it has to be equal to less than 2, because even if we had absolutely no shielding at 2 all, the highest z effective we could have is 2, so it makes perfect sense that we have a z effective that falls somewhere in the middle of those two.

    我们知道它必须小于,因为即使完全没有一点屏蔽,最高的有效的z是,所以我们得到的有效电荷量处于,两者之间就非常讲得通了,让我们来看看另一个例子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • If you had chosen Beta we would have all gotten B+'s but I guess not.

    如果大家都选β都能得B+,但不太可行

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定