But if we accept the no branching rule, we're saying whether or not we've got identity depends on what's happening elsewhere.

但如果我们接受了无分支规则，就等于赞同，我们是否有认同感依赖于在别处发生的事情。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And in many ways, we can understand human intellectual history just based on this idea: ? should we accept human nature?

在很多方面，我们能理解人类智力发展历史,仅仅基于这个观点：,应不应该接受人类本性？

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

Now if we accept the body theory, then of course we turn to the question ? "Could I survive my death?"

如果我们接受了肉体论，我们肯定会问,我可以死后复生吗“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It's a tricky way how do you impose your ideas and how do we accept other ideas. -Absolutely.

这挺奇妙的，怎样向别人推销自己的观点,而我们本身又是如何接受别的观点的，-的确如此。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

So, the radical idea here is you might not know what--why you do what you do and this is something we accept for things like visual perception.

由此引出的一个偏激的观点,你根本不知道自己为何要这么去做,这有点像我们获得视觉感知的过程。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

But in the meantime it's probably on this occasion, once we accept them both as having come under the influence of the same form of linguistic thinking, to say a little bit about the similarities and differences that exist between Derrida and de Man.

但同时在这种场合下可能，一旦我们接受这俩概念，在受到同样的语言学思想的影响后,我们就能看到一些,德里达和德曼之间存在的相同点和不同点。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

In the long run, we want The Wall Street Journal and so I guess that-- we just have to accept that.

但从长远来说,我们需要《华尔街日报》,所以我想,我们必须得接受

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

OK, so far though, I've just shown you what happens inside a peace a code. It raises an exception. It goes to that accept clause. We don't have to use it just inside of one place.

好了，我已经给你们看了,代码内部发生了什么,它报了一个异常，然后就到了处理的片段,我们不该就在一个地方用它。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

We're being asked to accept the fiction that Milton is having this very poem laid at the blessed feet of the infant Christ.

它想让我们接受这一幻景,幻景中弥尔顿正把这首诗,谦虚的在上帝圣洁的脚下安放。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Maybe you want to say, "You can't argue with that; we have to accept that.

不过你们也许会说：,“这是我们必须要去接受的;,没什么好争论的。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

Until we understand what he meant, we have no reason to either accept or reject his argument.

除非我们明了他的意思，我们无法,接受或拒绝他的论点。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

And we'll absolutely accept both answers for a neutral atom.

我们会接受两种答案,对于中性原子。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So again the point I was just emphasizing was even if we accept the personality theory, this doesn't threaten our being physicalists.

我刚才再次强调的一点,即使我们接受了人格论，也不会和物理主义学者的身份冲突。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I think we're going to perhaps be drawn to different answers, depending on whether we accept the body view or the personality view.

我想我们也许该根据自己是相信肉体理论，还是人格理论来选择答案。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But interestingly,things look rather different if we accept not the personality theory, but instead,the body theory.

但有趣的是，如果我们接受的不是人格理论，而是肉体理论，事情会有所不同。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So if we accept the body theory, ? would there be dead alive after death, ? could there be survivor that is at my body?

所以如果我们接受了肉体论，那么人死后还会复活吗，还会有人以我的肉体重生吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

When, rather than trying to fight or defeat our nature, we accept it.

不是想办法战斗打败我们的本性，我们接受它。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选