So in fact if I run this, ah, and save it, and it prints out odd.
因此实际上如果我运行这个,啊,先保存它,然后它输出奇数。
We'll save it. Well all right, a syntax error.
一个语法错误,这经常发生。
And I think for anyone who's concerned about human life and wants to save human life, this is a very easy way to do it.
我想,对于所有关心人类生命,想要拯救人类生命的人们来说,这是一种很简单的方式。
He says it's a good idea for people to save for their retirement during their earning years but it's wrong.
他说,让人们在能挣钱的年头为退休而攒钱,社保的初衷是好的,但这样做不对。
He points out that it's estimated that for every $3 you send to UNICEF, you can save a life.
他指出,据估计,你给联合国儿童基金会每寄去3美元,就能救助一个人的性命
So I hit control X. It's very unnecessarily arcanely saying save modified buffer, and then answering no will destroy changes.
敲入控制键X,它会很罗嗦地,问你是否保存所做的修改,如果回答为NO,就不保存修改过的部分。
Beethoven set it under the heading of "God Save the King, " George the Third or somebody.
贝多芬给它起名《天佑吾王》,乔治三世或者别的什么人
So some parents now are choosing to save the cord blood, have it frozen, locked away somewhere just in case its useful to their child later in life.
一些父母现在选择保存脐带血,冷冻储存起来,保存在某个地方以防万一,也许孩子将来用得着
But even if it isn't, that wouldn't save the argument.
但是即使它不是,那也挽救不了他的论证。
if you don't want to use that, you can also derive it as we did every time, it should intuitively make sense how we got there. But the exams are pretty short, so we don't want you doing that every time, so we'll save the 2 minutes and give you the equations directly, but it's still important to know how to use them.
吸收的和发射的,如果你不想用公式,你也可以每次都向我们这样推导它,很直观的就能得到结果,但考试时间很短,我们不希望你们每次都推导,所以我们会直告诉你,让你节省2分钟,但知道如何应用它十分重要。
Yeah, I'll save it.. It's a little bit annoying, but it makes the font bigger.
好,以这个数开始,让我们看看它干的怎么样。
Except, before I return the value, I save it.
除了我再返回之前,还保留了这个值意外。
And in fact, it lies at the heart of a lot of useful computational techniques where we save results.
实际上,它也是很多保存结果的,计算技巧的核心。
When you do something complicated you save the answers and then you go get it later.
当你计算一些复杂问题时,你保存答案,然后再次查询利用。
I think it's so important-- the life you can save.
我觉得这本书真的很重要-,《你可以拯救的生命》
I think it's kind of equivalent to say because I have more money, I have resources that can save people's lives, is it not okay for the government to take that from me?
我认为这相当于是说,因为我有很多钱,握有足够的资源拯救他人,这样政府从我这拿走钱,就是可以的吗?
应用推荐