I'm perfectly capable of understanding the past in and for itself without any contribution of my own, without, in short, any preconceptions."

我十分能够理解过去,而没有自己的贡献，简单点说就是没有任何的先入之见“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

See, that's what you are tempted to conclude if you say, "I can never get away from preconceptions." All right?

你可能会得出结论，我永远无法摆脱先入之见，是吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

It's practically impossible to begin a reading of Milton without the burden of innumerable prejudices and preconceptions.

想要不带大量的偏见或成见的解读米尔顿,几乎是不可能的。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

I bring a million preconceptions to bear on what I take to be a simple act of looking.

在我做看这个简单的动作时,我已经有了百万个先入之见。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Right? That's just what seems to be at risk if I can never get beyond my preconceptions.

对吗？如果我无法超于自己的先入之见,这似乎有风险。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

If I'm just dealing in preconceptions here, how can I take anything from the entity itself?"

如果我有先入之见，我怎么能理解这个存在呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

You cannot factor out these preconceptions.

人们无法抛开先入之见。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

he text refers back directly to our own preconceptions--" -Gadamer would call those "prejudices"- "which are revealed by the act of interpretation that is a basic element of the reading process."

他说，“文本最直接地起源于先入之见“，He，says：，“…,葛达玛会称这些为“偏见“,“这些先见会在我们的理解行为中体现出来,这是阅读过程中的基本元素“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选