If a deterministic system could nonetheless have free will, we could still be purely physical systems.

如果一个决定论系统能在此情况下,仍然拥有自由意志,我们仍可能只是纯粹的物理系统

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Because after all, premise three: 'All purely physical systems are subject to determinism.' Isn't it true after all that the basic laws of physics are deterministic laws?

毕竟,按照前提三,所有纯粹的物理系统都遵从决定论,基本的物理定律,难道不都是决定性的吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Most chemical changes, most physical changes don't happen in isolated systems.

但是大部分的化学反应,并不是发生在孤立系统中的。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

Suppose we then add three, all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

假设我们再往后添加第三点,所有纯物理系统都遵守决定论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

What about premise number three, "All purely physical systems are subject to determinism."

来说说前提三吧,所有纯粹的物理体系都遵从决定论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It just isn't true that all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

那么所有的纯粹物理系统,都遵从决定论就是错的了

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Three says, all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

三说,所有纯物理系统都遵守决定论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If we accept compatibilism, we'll be able to say, "Look, maybe we have free will and determinism is true of us; but for all that, we're still just purely physical systems."

如果我们接受相容主义,我们就能说,看啊,或许我们拥有自由意志,而决定论也适用于我们,但尽管如此,我们仍旧只是纯粹的物理系统

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Three, all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

三,所有纯粹的物理系统都服从于决定论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If determinism isn't true of us at the fundamental level, then even if you couldn't both have determinism and free will, we could still have free will, and yet, for all that, still be purely physical systems.

如果决定论在基础水平上不适用于我们,那即使你不能,同时遵从决定论和拥有自由意志,我们仍能拥有自由意志,而且,尽管如此,我们仍旧属于纯粹的物理系统

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So even if it does turn out that you can't have free will and determinism, that doesn't rule out the possibility that we are purely physical objects, because not all purely physical systems are subject to determinism.

因此即使最终证实,你不能同时拥有自由意志和遵从决定论,也不能排除我们是纯粹,物理实体的可能性,因为并不是所有的纯粹物理系统,都遵从决定论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选