There's no classical analogy that explains oh, this is what you can kind of picture when you picture a wave function.

可以解释：,哦，这就是，你想象的,波函数的样子啊。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

All right. So jumping in to having established that, yes, particles have wave-like behavior, even though no, hey're not actually photons, we can't use that equation.

好的，我们已经承认了，粒子有波动性，虽然它们不是光子，我们不能用这个方程。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

If a photon which has no mass can behave as a particle, does it follow then an electron which has mass can behave as a wave? 1920.

如果一个没有质量的光子,能像粒子一样运动，那么它能像一个,没有质量的电子那样以波的形式运动吗。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

We can't actually go ahead and derive this equation of the wave function squared, because no one ever derived it, it's just an interpretation, but it's an interpretation that works essentially perfectly.

从这个方程中,导出，波函数的平方，没有人可以这样做，这仅仅是一种解释，但这种解释，能解释的很好，自从它第一次被提出来之后。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

If a proton which has no mass can behave as a particle does it follow that an electron which has mass can behave as a wave?

如果一个没质量的光子能像粒子一样,具有质量的电子能否,表现得像波一样吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

I'm going to say that an electron's a wave no matter how much my father says differently, and I'm going to get a Nobel Prize for that, and he does.

我要说电子是一个波,无法这与我父亲的观点如何对立，我也要为此得到一个诺贝尔奖，他确实做到了。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

But luckily we don't have to worry about how we're going to picture all this, now that I said that, no physical interpretation f or a wave function, there is a physical interpretation for what a wave function squared means.

如何想象这些图像,我这么说，虽然波函数，物理解释,但波函数的平方，有物理解释,当我们说到。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

There's no classical way to think about what a wave function is.

我们没有办法从经典力学的角度,想象波函数是什么样的，没有经典的类比。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选