In political philosophy it is never a sufficient answer to answer a question with a statement " "because Plato says so " " or "because Nietzsche says so."

对于政治哲学而言,答案永远都嫌不充足,无法仅用一段陈述来回答一个问题,“因为柏拉图如是说“,“因为尼采如是说“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Because I feel like a portrait is an answer to a question which is, 'What was this person like?'

因为我觉得肖像画是这样一个问题的答案，那就是“这个人长什么样？"

关于现代美术 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

I couldn't answer a question like that in front of him.

就不班门弄斧了

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Yes or no. That can give you a true or false, a one or a zero answer. What about this?

是或者否，它告诉你真假，1，或，0，这个怎么样？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So, if you want to estimate how many grammatical sentences under twenty words in English, the answer is, "A lot."

如果你想估计一下,用二十个英文单词,可以组成多少个符合语法的句子,答案会是,"很多"

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

We can move things around and it's far more exciting for me to answer your questions than to have a monologue.

我们可以稍作调整,而且回答你们的问题,要比我这一个人干讲有意思多了

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

So you know from algebra I can't actually solve this. There may be multiple solutions to this. What would I have to do to change my code? And the answer is fortunately not a lot.

我解不出来方程,可能会有多组答案,我需要怎样修改我的代码呢？,很幸运的,答案是不用修改很多。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

We now have 77% getting the correct answer, for a very similar question , we only had about 30-something percent on Friday.

我们有77%的同学%,回答正确了，上周五和这类似的问题，只有大概30%左右答对了。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

A famous mathematician once said "Every question must have a correct answer " for every question one answer."

一位著名的数学家曾说过,“每一个问题都必定有一个正确的答案,每一个人们所回答的问题“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Okay these--you guys are all right, everything that I heard was a correct answer.

很好 这些原因--你们说的都很对,我听到的每一个答案都是正确答案

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

It sounds like too obvious even to be worth stating in class, so let me now try and shake your faith a little bit in this answer.

这个道理太很明了甚至不值得讨论,那我们来看看到底是不是这样的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.

所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And there is a lot of research to answer this question.

大量研究都尝试回答这个问题。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

That's a brave answer. Thank you.

很有勇气的回答，谢谢。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And then, I'm going to skip down a little bit: Though she never again called back any image of the dead man to dress up, pose, talk to and make answer, neither would she lose a new compassion for the cul-de-sac he'd tried to find a way out of, for the enigma his efforts had created.

接下来，我会跳过一些内容往下说：,虽然她从没有想起过，那个死人穿衣、摆弄姿势、,说话和回答问题时的样子，她也不会失去对他的同情，对他尝试摆脱,无路可走的困境所付出的，谜团一般的努力。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

What else can you detect as a yes or no answer is the mouse down?

当鼠标点下时，除了检查真假还能检测什么？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选