-
With the computer today, you can, for the most part, not represent every possible number that mankind can think of.
在当今世界，大多数情况下，并不是要把每个数字,都精确表示出来。
-
and so we were able to kind of each take a different piece of the whole
所以我们把一个整体分成不同部分，每个人负责不同的部分，
-
Identify the best responses of each player as a function of the others and find out where they intersect.
把每个人的最佳对策看成别人策略的函数,然后找出函数的交点
-
So as the particles on the disk that get the current in the read/write head moving put together millions of these magnetized segments and you've got a file.
通过读写头你就可以得到每个粒子的极性,如果把这些上百万粒子的信息,汇聚要一起就够成了一个文件。
-
I'm going to assign each chunk to a different writer. And they're going to go off and write that element, that hour's worth of stuff.
我将把每个部分分给一个作家,它们将撰写每一个部分,也就是每个小时的内容，你可以想象你得到的是什么：
-
Let's do everything unit. That is a good way.
让我们把每个东西都分单元，这是个好的方式。
-
What you would like to is everybody in the community exactly the same preparation so that you could predict what everybody's response to the vaccine would be.
最好是把完全一致的制剂,分发给每个人,这样才能预测每个人,对疫苗的反应
-
He did not ever imagine the abandonment of the table of ranks, which set everybody in a hierarchy, not for a minute-- we're talking about the end of the end of the 17th and 18th century.
他绝不会想要抛弃一个,把每个人都划分阶层的等级社会,从来没有动过这个念头,我们说的是在十七世纪末到十八世纪初
-
In the aftermath of Darwin in particular, our understanding of natural selection, our understanding of genetic hard-wiring and other factors, makes us begin to wonder in what sense we can consider ourselves, each of us, to be autonomous subjects.
特别是继达尔文之后，我们对于自然选择，基因和其他因素的理解，让我们开始思考在哪种意义上我们每个人，可以把自己视为有自主性的主体。
-
So, when we talked about Lewis structures, we actually assigned electrons to individual atoms or to individual bonds.
当我们讨论Lewis结构时，我们把每个电子指派到,各个原子或键上去。
-
some of good, some of evil substance, and yet God, in that unapocryphal vision, said without exception, "Rise, Peter, kill and eat," leaving the choice to each man's discretion.
都是一些好的或是不好的物质，上帝经过真实所见，说没有特例，“上升，彼得，杀死然后吃“，把决策权留给每个人自由决定。
-
Everybody had their special ornaments that they like to put on the tree.
每个人都会把自己喜欢的、特别的饰物挂到树上。
-
so you know, almost everyone is going to be spending all their time,
所以几乎每个人将会把所有的时间都用于学习，
-
Extrapolating from the fact that there are different things which people take into account, not everyone closest to 6 might actually vote for 6, it might be coincidence.
考虑到人们关注的东西都不一样,这个实际情况,每个最靠近立场6的人,未必把票都投给选择立场6的候选人了,这可能只是巧合
-
Another thing I want to point out about every sigma orbital that you see, and it will make more sense when we contrast it with pi orbitals later.
另外一个我要指出的事情就是,关于每个sigma轨道你能看到,当我们把它和π轨道对比的时候会看的更清楚。
-
So what would I want to do? I'd like to somehow walk down each of the digits one at a time and add them up. Ah, that's a looping mechanism, right? I need to have some way of walking through them.
去取这个数的,每个数字然后把他们加起来,啊，这是个循环机制对不对？,我得找到一个遍历它们的方法,一种简单的方法可能。
-
Again, for those-- for whom this is blocked, I'm just dividing the rectangle into smaller squares which is to say that memory is addressable.
这是一整块的，我只是把它划分成一个个小区域,每个小区域都可以设定一个地址。
-
One way to think about Nash equilibria is that they are self-enforcing agreements, so provided that everyone believes that everyone is going to go along with this agreement, then everyone in fact will.
我们可以这样理解纳什均衡,把它们想象成自我实施的协议,假设每个人都相信,大家都会遵守协议,那么大家就都会遵守
-
So when we write that out, we just write sigma 1 s squared, or we can break it up into its individual parts, there's no reason we can't do that as well.
当我们把这个写出来时，我们写sigma1s的平方，或者我们可以把它拆分成每个部分，我们没有理由不能这么做。
-
I've got a list, walk you through it an element at a time, do I look at each element of the list more than once?
你一次只能得到他的一个元素,我是不是把数组里面的每个元素，都过了大于等于一次？,你不这样认为么？大家有什么建议？
-
This strategy set--formally, Let's just simplify it here-- let's assume that for each Firm i they can set their price anything bigger than 0 and anything less than 1, just to keep life simple.
至于策略集合,我们把它简化成,假设每个公司i能,将它们的价格设定为,大于0并且小于1,仅仅为了简化处理
应用推荐