Right? Never mind the extent to which the language is connected to a world of which one is attempting to make sense.
我们都试图理解这个世界,语言则与这个世界息息相关,即使略去这一点不谈。
you're not sure which one in particular you're talking about.
你不确定哪个是你特别想谈的。
You want to talk about it systematically, but how can you talk about anything systematically if you don't know what it is?
人们总希望系统化地谈一件事,但是你一点都不了解它,怎么能系统化地谈它呢?
Is keeping you a job, regardless of your sex orientation and human right, I'll place that a whole lot higher, the right to life?
撇开性取向问题不谈,这么说或许有点夸张,提供工作难道属于人权的一种吗?
I won't go through them. I just list a few of them here.
这我就不谈了,我在这里列出了几个。
Second, well we're not getting to the second one; let's see what-- okay as I mentioned the lecture slides will be posted almost always the same day after the class.
第二点我们暂时不谈,课程的课件会放在网站上,通常是那一天下课后
I'll stay away from the political comments.
我们不谈国事。
You can say put aside the economic debates, taxation.
你可以先撇开经济争论,征税等问题不谈。
But again, just put those details aside.
但话说回来,撇开这些细节不谈。
Well,it wants to rationalize the administration of France-- it wants to do other things,too, but that's not this course.
它想对法国行政机构设置进行合理化改进,当然了,革命还有其它的目的,这节课我们先不谈
Now, I'm not sure what kind of video we're talking about, and I'm not sure if the lecture will be the internet when we're all done. But nonetheless I'm gonna call this the next big thing-the video internet .
呃,我不确定我们要谈关于什么样的视频,我也不确定当这个讲座全部结束时,还是不是关于网络,但尽管如此,我还是要叫它为下一重大事件,网络视频。
How could you develop an argument in which a thought like that might actually seem to work? After all, Foucault--setting himself aside, he doesn't mention himself--Foucault very much admires certain writers.
你如何为这样一个看起来可能的想法,去辩护呢?毕竟,福柯--不谈他自己,他从不提到自己-福柯很钦佩一些作家。
But we won't talk about that now.
不过今天我们先不谈这个。
If you have a computer that plays chess and you want to explain how the computer plays chess, it's impossible to do so without talking about the programs and mechanisms inside the computer.
如果你有一台能下国际象棋的计算机,你想要解释计算机是如何下国际象棋的,如果你不谈程序以及计算机的内部结构,那你就不能对它如何下国际象棋,给出解释。
Well, I don't know. It seems to me that literary influence is not at all unlike sort of speaking or writing in the wake of a founder of discursivity, but we can let that pass.
我不知道,我觉得,文学的影响力和演讲和写作的影响力还是有相似之处的,尤其是在散漫性被发现之后,但是我们可以不谈这个。
And just to simplify the discussion, put aside the question of law, let's assume that you as the jury are charged with deciding whether what they did was morally permissible or not.
为了简化讨论过程,撇开法律问题不谈,假设你们作为陪审团,只需裁定,他们的所作所为,在道德上是否是允许的。
But in keeping with the focus of our discussion about the badness of death, I want to put aside the moral question ? and think about how good or bad for me ? is it that there's variability in death?
但是为了重点讨论,死亡的坏处,我要撇开道德问题不谈,转而考虑这种情况对我是好是坏,如果死亡有可变性的话?
应用推荐