These values are regarded by them as purely subjective again their own value judgment so to speak and not strictly speaking a part of the science of politics.
他们视这些价值观是纯粹主观的,可说是他们自身的价值判断,严格来说,并非,政治科学的一部份。
It's regarded perhaps by today's political science as too value laden too subjective to speak of statesmanship or statecraft. This too again is a word that carries distinctive and strong ? connotations. Who is a statesman?
因那在今日的政治科学可能包含,太多的价值观,讲领袖风范太过主观或说权术,而也是这个字,它含带了特殊与强烈的内涵,谁是政治家?
And there are some philosophers and psychologists who do just that, who claim that free will and responsibility and spiritual value and intrinsic value are all illusions; they're pre-scientific notions that get washed away in modern science or you could try to reconcile them.
一些哲学家和心理学家便是如此,他们认为,自由意志,责任,精神价值,内在价值,这些都是幻象,都是些前科学的概念,应当从现代科学中清洗出去,或者你可以试着将二者调和
应用推荐