Should we conclude,therefore, that the key to the important question--namely, What matters? the answer to that question, should we conclude,is,same personality?

我们是否就该得出结论，重要问题的关键，也就是什么是最重要的，这问题的答案就是相同的人格吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Should we conclude therefore that, ? no, you should always be thinking about the facts about death?

那么我们是不是应该得出结论说，不，你应该一直考虑着关于死亡的事实？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's a limiting case, but for the most part language that we use is not like that and therefore, what we think of is that literary should in principle also be able to show itself in something that is visual.

那是个很局限性的案例，但是总的来说，我们使用的语言,并不是那样,因此，我们所认为的文学的东西,原则上也应当能展示,一些视觉上的东西。

麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

So should we conclude,therefore, that what really matters is not just survival but having the same personality?

那么我们是否就能得出以下的结论，真正关键的不是存活本身而是拥有相同的人格？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, should we conclude, therefore, so nobody really believes that they're ever in dreamless sleep?

那么我们就应该得出结论，没有人真正相信,他们可以进入无梦的睡眠么？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Still, granted the premise, if you can't picture it or imagine it, you can't believe in it-- Should we conclude, therefore, that you can't believe you're going to be dead?

但让我们仍然基于，无法想象的东西是不能相信的这个前提-,我们就该得出，人不能相信自己的死亡,这一结论吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

should we conclude therefore, given that we've got the premise, "If you can't picture it or imagine it, then you can't believe in it," since I've just said, look, you can't imagine being dead, but that's not due to any failure of imagination, that's because there's nothing there to imagine or picture.

于是我们就应该基于这个前提，想象不了的东西就不能相信，得出结论吗“,我刚才已经说过，人不能想象自己的死亡，不是因为想象的失败，而是本来就没有东西可以想象。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选