so why do you have the second chapter of this book retell the same story that the first chapter of the book told?
为什么一本书的第二章,要重复一遍第一章说过的故事?
I think we mentioned that in the first chapter of the book there.
我想我们在课本第一章,有所提及
There's a whole, a-75-page chapter on Hitchcock which is crucial in the book, we'll explain all that to you And in the first chapter on Hitchcock there's a considerable discussion of Psycho.
关于希契科克的那一章有75页之长,在这书中是关键的一章,我会给你们讲解,在关于希契科克的那一章里,有很多对于《精神病患者》的论述。
If you look at his book, again in the first chapter, he gives a list of countries-- it's based on an analysis that some others--that Professors Dimson, Marsh, and Stanton used in their 2002 book.
如果你再看看他在书中所讲的第一章,他列出了一些发达国家的名单-,这是根据其他一些人分析得出的,如迪姆森,马什及斯坦顿教授,在他们2002年出版的书中都用过。
but though there were also chapters that analyze films to be count as being a form of films studies, too but the first chapter is concerned about the whole question about form and content technique and meaning.
虽然也有章节,是分析电影的,所以这本书也算讨论了电影,但是第一章讲的是,关于内容和形式的问题,关于技术和意义的问题。
应用推荐